llvm dev - Jan 2014 - [LLVMdev] AArch64 Clang CLI interface proposal

Hi,

Clang for AArch64 currently accepts an -mfpu option to specify the FPU/NEON
unit. This behaviour, while consistent with the ARM target and ARM gcc, will
no longer be supported in AArch64 gcc. The preferred CLI for specifying
FPU/NEON units will be the use of the -march option with feature modifiers
(+[no]feature). The feature modifiers according to the GCC manual are:
* crypto
* fp
* simd (implies fp)

For example, "clang -march=cortex-a57+crypto" or "clang
-march=generic+nosimd". Whether or not simd (neon) is enabled by default is
an orthogonal issue.

We plan on implementing this interface for AArch64 Clang in future, and
completely dropping the current support for -mfpu. This means that -march
will become the preferred way to specify the target CPU/architecture.

-mgeneral-regs-only:
This is an option currently supported by AArch64 GCC, which we would also
like to implement. Passing this option to the compiler should ensure that it
generates code which only uses the general purpose registers. Otherwise, the
compiler should throw an error.

Is this proposal reasonable?

Thanks,
Amara

On 7 January 2014 17:05, Amara Emerson <amara.emerson at arm.com> wrote:
> We plan on implementing this interface for AArch64 Clang in future, and
> completely dropping the current support for -mfpu. This means that -march
> will become the preferred way to specify the target CPU/architecture.
>
Hi Amara,

This is something we were converging on the ARM32 world, too, and I believe
other targets would probably do the same, if not before us. Hopefully,
that'd also help clean up the driver's code in the process.

cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140107/65b43f60/attachment.html>

Parsing the arch string is a bit icky, but I don't really have too much of
a problem with it - and it's better than -mcpu so...

-eric

On Tue Jan 07 2014 at 9:23:43 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at
linaro.org>
wrote:
> On 7 January 2014 17:05, Amara Emerson <amara.emerson at arm.com>
wrote:
>
> We plan on implementing this interface for AArch64 Clang in future, and
> completely dropping the current support for -mfpu. This means that -march
> will become the preferred way to specify the target CPU/architecture.
>
>
> Hi Amara,
>
> This is something we were converging on the ARM32 world, too, and I
> believe other targets would probably do the same, if not before us.
> Hopefully, that'd also help clean up the driver's code in the
process.
>
> cheers,
> --renato
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140107/8372367f/attachment.html>