Daniel Liew
2013-Dec-20 22:30 UTC
[LLVMdev] [LLVM] What has happened to LLVM bitcode archive support?
> I would suggest for now building the archive with gnu ar and the > plugin, that way you have an index and don't need to read all members.Thanks for the suggestion.I'll check out [1]. It would be definitely be faster using LLVMGold.so with ar but to be honest I'd rather take a small performance hit but make life much easier for our users at the moment because the build process for our tool is already very complicated. I'll definitely have a play with LLVMGold though as I've always wanted to give LTO a go. Within a few releases of LLVM hopefully lld will have the features I need :) Thanks for all your help. [1] http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html Cheers, Dan Liew.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [LLVMdev] [LLVM] What has happened to LLVM bitcode archive support?
- [LLVMdev] [LLVM] What has happened to LLVM bitcode archive support?
- [LLVMdev] [LLVM] What has happened to LLVM bitcode archive support?
- [LLVMdev] [LLVM] What has happened to LLVM bitcode archive support?
- [LLVMdev] [LLVM] What has happened to LLVM bitcode archive support?