Hal Finkel
2013-Sep-13 20:37 UTC
[LLVMdev] [RFC] New function attributes for errno-setting functions
----- Original Message -----> On 9/13/2013 2:23 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > > Maybe the easiest way would be to insert an intrinsic > > @llvm.errno.read() whenever errno (as a source token) appears in > > the source as an rvalue (and do some similar thing when it appears > > as a lvalue). Thoughts? > > I think the major problem is still with "errno" defined as a > preprocessor macro, as it may not look like errno by the time the > front-end sees it.That's why I said source token (I meant preprocessor token), but any such solution would not be robust to preprocessed source files, and that seems like a big problem.> Perhaps some configuration test could preprocess > something like "var = errno;" and check what's really getting stored > in > "var", but it may be unreliable (i.e. not detect all cases). > > I thought a bit more about it and I think we will need to have this > information to prevent similar problems as the one you mentioned in > the > first post. For example: > > int fd = open(...); > int saved_errno = errno; > double s = sqrt(var); > if (fd == -1) > fprintf(stderr, "error: %d\n", saved_errno); > > > With only the information about modifying errno, this code could be > transformed to > > int fd = open(...); > double s = sqrt(var); > int saved_errno = errno; > if (fd == -1) > fprintf(stderr, "error: %d\n", saved_errno); > > again producing the same situation.No, I don't think so. If sqrt is not readnone or readonly, then it should potentially alias whatever the errno macro actually expands to (whether it is a global variable, and thread-local variable, a function call, or whatever). -Hal> > > -K > > > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, > hosted by The Linux Foundation >-- Hal Finkel Assistant Computational Scientist Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory
Krzysztof Parzyszek
2013-Sep-13 21:09 UTC
[LLVMdev] [RFC] New function attributes for errno-setting functions
On 9/13/2013 3:37 PM, Hal Finkel wrote:> > No, I don't think so. If sqrt is not readnone or readonly, then it should potentially alias whatever the errno macro actually expands to (whether it is a global variable, and thread-local variable, a function call, or whatever).I'm not sure about this. How about this: extern int BLAH; #define errno BLAH Then we have int fd = open(...); int saved_errno = BLAH; double s = sqrt(var); If "sqrt" is "write-only-errno", how would we know that BLAH should be aliased with sqrt? We don't to alias it with every global variable (that's what this proposal is trying to address). We'd need a way to associate BLAH with errno, or else we're in the same place as we are now. -K -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Hal Finkel
2013-Sep-13 21:18 UTC
[LLVMdev] [RFC] New function attributes for errno-setting functions
----- Original Message -----> On 9/13/2013 3:37 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > > No, I don't think so. If sqrt is not readnone or readonly, then it > > should potentially alias whatever the errno macro actually expands > > to (whether it is a global variable, and thread-local variable, a > > function call, or whatever). > > I'm not sure about this. How about this: > > extern int BLAH; > #define errno BLAH > > Then we have > > int fd = open(...); > int saved_errno = BLAH; > double s = sqrt(var); > > If "sqrt" is "write-only-errno", how would we know that BLAH should > be > aliased with sqrt? We don't to alias it with every global variable > (that's what this proposal is trying to address). We'd need a way to > associate BLAH with errno, or else we're in the same place as we are > now.No, this is exactly what we do. It needs to be pessimistic in this sense. "write-only-errno" only helps to prove things about potential alising with pointers that we *know* can't be errno (like local stack allocations). Any global might be errno, so that can't count. -Hal> > -K > > > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, > hosted by The Linux Foundation >-- Hal Finkel Assistant Computational Scientist Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory
Reasonably Related Threads
- [LLVMdev] [RFC] New function attributes for errno-setting functions
- [LLVMdev] [RFC] New function attributes for errno-setting functions
- [LLVMdev] [RFC] New function attributes for errno-setting functions
- [LLVMdev] [RFC] New function attributes for errno-setting functions
- [LLVMdev] [RFC] New function attributes for errno-setting functions