Daniel Liew
2013-Feb-13 22:36 UTC
[LLVMdev] Overhauling the command-line processing/codegen options code
On 13 February 2013 19:37, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:> Is anyone currently working on overhauling the command-line processing code? >I'm currently doing some work on the CommandLine library but I don't think my work is going to help you. I'm current working on... - Allowing declared command line options to be put into categories to allow a categorised --help for tools - Providing an iterator so that clients can iterate through registered command line options and programmatically hide options. I did send out an e-mail about the idea last week ( http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-February/059129.html ) but didn't hear anything back so assumed there were no objections to the idea. I'll keep an eye on this thread though. Regards, Dan Liew.
Justin Holewinski
2013-Feb-14 01:58 UTC
[LLVMdev] Overhauling the command-line processing/codegen options code
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Daniel Liew <daniel.liew at imperial.ac.uk>wrote:> On 13 February 2013 19:37, Justin Holewinski > <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > > Is anyone currently working on overhauling the command-line processing > code? > > > > I'm currently doing some work on the CommandLine library but I don't > think my work is going to help you. I'm current working on... > > - Allowing declared command line options to be put into categories to > allow a categorised --help for tools > - Providing an iterator so that clients can iterate through registered > command line options and programmatically hide options. > > I did send out an e-mail about the idea last week ( > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-February/059129.html ) > but didn't hear anything back so assumed there were no objections to > the idea. > > I'll keep an eye on this thread though. >That looks useful! For this proposal, though, I'm not looking at extending the functionality of command-line options. I just need a thread-safe way of control the existing options.> > Regards, > Dan Liew. >-- Thanks, Justin Holewinski -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130213/43bb7c99/attachment.html>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [LLVMdev] Fwd: Overhauling the command-line processing/codegen options code
- [LLVMdev] Overhauling the command-line processing/codegen options code
- [LLVMdev] Overhauling the command-line processing/codegen options code
- [LLVMdev] Modifying the support CommandLine Library to support option categories and iteration over registered options
- [LLVMdev] [PATCH][RFC] Add llvm.codegen Intrinsic To Support Embedded LLVM IR Code Generation