We have customers that rely on the symbol information from the
"pubnames" section in the DWARF data. Generation of this information
was removed in this commit:
commit dfa30e1ab243990eda4732a6dffb91e965e7a755
Author: Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com>
Date: Wed Nov 9 05:24:07 2011 +0000
Remove the pubnames section, no one consumes it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk at 144169
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I could submit a patch that brings it back (some tweaks were needed).
Is this something you could consider?
-Krzysztof
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
>We have customers that rely on the symbol information from the >"pubnames" section in the DWARF data. Generation of this information >was removed in this commit: > >commit dfa30e1ab243990eda4732a6dffb91e965e7a755 >Author: Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> >Date: Wed Nov 9 05:24:07 2011 +0000 > > Remove the pubnames section, no one consumes it. > > git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk at 144169 >91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 > > >I could submit a patch that brings it back (some tweaks were needed). >Is this something you could consider? > >-KrzysztofI'd ask that it be made target-dependent, as I don't want it (and apparently few do, which is why it was removed). Thanks, --paulr
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Robinson, Paul <Paul.Robinson at am.sony.com>wrote:> >We have customers that rely on the symbol information from the > >"pubnames" section in the DWARF data. Generation of this information > >was removed in this commit: > > > >commit dfa30e1ab243990eda4732a6dffb91e965e7a755 > >Author: Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> > >Date: Wed Nov 9 05:24:07 2011 +0000 > > > > Remove the pubnames section, no one consumes it. > > > > git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk at 144169 > >91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 > > > > > >I could submit a patch that brings it back (some tweaks were needed). > >Is this something you could consider? > > > >-Krzysztof > > I'd ask that it be made target-dependent, as I don't want it > (and apparently few do, which is why it was removed). >No worries there, it can be put under a flag perhaps. -eric -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130111/1e94dbad/attachment.html>