llvm dev - Dec 2012 - [LLVMdev] test-suite

On 12/12/2012 10:18 AM, Nadav Rotem wrote:
> I run the test suite by CD-ing into /projects/test-suite and running
"make TEST=simple -j 4".
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com>
wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to run test-suite for x86 in order to verify a target
independent patch before I put it back.
>> The patch has been approved.
>>
>> What is the best way to run it in order to get maximum coverage and
have results where I can tell that I have not regressed anything (as well as the
test-suite can help with that)?
>>
>> I've already tested it against the Mips compiler but we have a
slightly modified harness.
>>
>> It seems that some things about test-suite have changed from when I
last ran the suite on x86 a month ago when I was first testing the patch.
>>
>> Tia.
>>
>> Reed
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
I was running on ubuntu but just typed "make" in test-suite.

When I type "make TEST=simple" it seems to work ok, with about 3 or 4 
failures from other tests. I am resynching source right now to see if 
those problems go away.

reed kotler wrote:
> I was running on ubuntu but just typed "make" in test-suite.
> 
> When I type "make TEST=simple" it seems to work ok, with about 3
or
Why isn't make in the test-suite defaulting to TEST=simple when TEST is not
set?

Thanks,
Sebastian
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The
Linux Foundation

On 12/12/2012 10:10 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> reed kotler wrote:
>> I was running on ubuntu but just typed "make" in test-suite.
>>
>> When I type "make TEST=simple" it seems to work ok, with
about 3 or
> Why isn't make in the test-suite defaulting to TEST=simple when TEST is
not set?
>
> Thanks,
> Sebastian
I thought that was how it worked the last time I used it but not now.