Rafael EspĂndola
2012-Nov-24 02:17 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A Great Renaming of Things (or: Let's Repaint ALL the Bikesheds!)
> I really dislike that all the files and classes in the MC library > start with MC. This is c++, not c :(Same here.> > - Michael SpencerCheers, Rafael
Tinco Andringa
2012-Nov-24 09:02 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A Great Renaming of Things (or: Let's Repaint ALL the Bikesheds!)
Hi, I think it's an awesome idea to make sure all names are logical. It is an essential feature of a good API to have logical naming :)> I really dislike that all the files and classes in the MC library > start with MC. This is c++, not c :(On a similar note, all the classes in clang/CodeGen are prefixed with CG or even CodeGen, could those be renamed as well? And speaking of the clang codegenerator, I as a llvm newbie was confused by the ModuleBuilder.h/.cpp. These files actually contain the definition of the CodeGenerator itself that I was searching for (being sort of the entry point of the codegenerator). I think it would be more clear if they were called CodeGenerator.h/.cpp. Or perhaps even splitted out into CodeGenerator.h and IR/CodeGenerator.h/.cpp. Kind regards, Tinco
John McCall
2012-Nov-27 23:35 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A Great Renaming of Things (or: Let's Repaint ALL the Bikesheds!)
On Nov 24, 2012, at 1:02 AM, Tinco Andringa <mail at tinco.nl> wrote:> Hi, > > I think it's an awesome idea to make sure all names are logical. It is > an essential feature of a good API to have logical naming :) > >> I really dislike that all the files and classes in the MC library >> start with MC. This is c++, not c :( > > On a similar note, all the classes in clang/CodeGen are prefixed with > CG or even CodeGen, could those be renamed as well?Yes. For example, CodeGenFunction would become IRGenFunction. CGCall.cpp would become... probably either GenCall.cpp or IRGenCall.cpp, with my preference being the shortest that's still unambiguous throughout the project, which I think means Gen*.> And speaking of the clang codegenerator, I as a llvm newbie was > confused by the ModuleBuilder.h/.cpp. These files actually contain the > definition of the CodeGenerator itself that I was searching for (being > sort of the entry point of the codegenerator). > > I think it would be more clear if they were called > CodeGenerator.h/.cpp. Or perhaps even splitted out into > CodeGenerator.h and IR/CodeGenerator.h/.cpp.This is really just a historical accident, and I have no objections to fixing it. John.
Reasonably Related Threads
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A Great Renaming of Things (or: Let's Repaint ALL the Bikesheds!)
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A Great Renaming of Things (or: Let's Repaint ALL the Bikesheds!)
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A Great Renaming of Things (or: Let's Repaint ALL the Bikesheds!)
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A Great Renaming of Things (or: Let's Repaint ALL the Bikesheds!)
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A Great Renaming of Things (or: Let's Repaint ALL the Bikesheds!)