The following bugs look like they only relate to llvm-gcc. Can they be closed, as llvm-gcc is no longer supported? http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3636 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5011 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6764 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8451 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9310 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9311 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9312 Thanks, Jay. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120501/72812d69/attachment.html>
Hi Jay,> The following bugs look like they only relate to llvm-gcc. Can they be closed, > as llvm-gcc is no longer supported? > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3636 > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5011 > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6764 > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8451 > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9310 > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9311 > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9312I closed them all. Ciao, Duncan.
On 1 May 2012 12:40, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:> > Hi Jay, > > >> The following bugs look like they only relate to llvm-gcc. Can they be closed, >> as llvm-gcc is no longer supported? >> >> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3636 >> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5011 >> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6764 >> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8451 >> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9310 >> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9311 >> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9312 > > > I closed them all.Thanks! Jay.
On 1 May 2012 12:34, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote:> The following bugs look like they only relate to llvm-gcc. Can they be > closed, as llvm-gcc is no longer supported?Also: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1375 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2203 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2522 Duncan, do you think these should be moved to dragonegg? Thanks, Jay.
Hi Jay, they all seem to work with dragonegg, so I closed them. Ciao, Duncan. On 04/05/12 13:37, Jay Foad wrote:> On 1 May 2012 12:34, Jay Foad<jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: >> The following bugs look like they only relate to llvm-gcc. Can they be >> closed, as llvm-gcc is no longer supported? > > Also: > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1375 > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2203 > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2522 > > Duncan, do you think these should be moved to dragonegg? > > Thanks, > Jay.