Peng Wang
2011-Sep-15 10:51 UTC
[LLVMdev] Can llvm support a target backend without function call ?
Hi all, I am writing a llvm backend for a small stream processor. Because of its special application field, the processor does not support function. When I built the llvm backend for the new target, I leave the calling convention and frame lowering part blank. It compilered correctly, but I encountered execution errors, like *[xxx at localhost ex]$ llc test.ll -march=SSP -o test.s 0 llc 0x08f7ee49 1 llc 0x08f7f41a 2 0x003b1420 __kernel_sigreturn + 0 3 llc 0x08de0d52 llvm::TargetData::getAlignment(llvm::Type const*, bool) const + 44 4 llc 0x08de108a llvm::TargetData::getABITypeAlignment(llvm::Type const*) const + 44 5 llc 0x0863e289 llvm::TargetData::getTypeAllocSize(llvm::Type const*) const + 37 6 llc 0x08a707ed llvm::GetReturnInfo(llvm::Type const*, unsigned int, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::ISD::OutputArg>&, llvm::TargetLowering const&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<unsigned long long>*) + 573 7 llc 0x089b59be llvm::FunctionLoweringInfo::set(llvm::Function const&, llvm::MachineFunction&) + 156 8 llc 0x08a4ec8a llvm::SelectionDAGISel::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) + 280 9 llc 0x08b7c191 llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) + 89 10 llc 0x08eb92f1 llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) + 315 11 llc 0x08eb94bb llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 121 12 llc 0x08eb8fbf llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 413 13 llc 0x08eba3b0 llvm::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) + 124 14 llc 0x08eba415 llvm::PassManager::run(llvm::Module&) + 39 15 llc 0x0859a610 main + 2470 16 libc.so.6 0x0097de9c __libc_start_main + 220 17 llc 0x08598b61 Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: llc test.ll -march=SSP -o test.s 1. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module 'test.ll'. 2. Running pass 'SSP DAG->DAG Pattern Instruction Selection' on function '@add' Segmentation fault * I think the error comes from the lacking support of function call. Should I write some fake codes to walk around, or I have some ways to tell LLVM that I do not want function call? Actually, I tried to write LLVM IR without the function form of define @main(..., but with function body directly. Unfortunately, everything seems must work with a function call, otherwise llc will not work. Best wishes! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110915/adad412e/attachment.html>
Justin Holewinski
2011-Sep-15 11:15 UTC
[LLVMdev] Can llvm support a target backend without function call ?
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Peng Wang <paulart.wang at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi all, > > I am writing a llvm backend for a small stream processor. Because of its > special application field, the processor does not support function. When I > built the llvm backend for the new target, I leave the calling convention > and frame lowering part blank. It compilered correctly, but I encountered > execution errors, like > > *[xxx at localhost ex]$ llc test.ll -march=SSP -o test.s > 0 llc 0x08f7ee49 > 1 llc 0x08f7f41a > 2 0x003b1420 __kernel_sigreturn + 0 > 3 llc 0x08de0d52 llvm::TargetData::getAlignment(llvm::Type const*, > bool) const + 44 > 4 llc 0x08de108a llvm::TargetData::getABITypeAlignment(llvm::Type > const*) const + 44 > 5 llc 0x0863e289 llvm::TargetData::getTypeAllocSize(llvm::Type > const*) const + 37 > 6 llc 0x08a707ed llvm::GetReturnInfo(llvm::Type const*, unsigned > int, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::ISD::OutputArg>&, llvm::TargetLowering > const&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<unsigned long long>*) + 573 > 7 llc 0x089b59be llvm::FunctionLoweringInfo::set(llvm::Function > const&, llvm::MachineFunction&) + 156 > 8 llc 0x08a4ec8a > llvm::SelectionDAGISel::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) + 280 > 9 llc 0x08b7c191 > llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) + 89 > 10 llc 0x08eb92f1 llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) > + 315 > 11 llc 0x08eb94bb llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + > 121 > 12 llc 0x08eb8fbf llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + > 413 > 13 llc 0x08eba3b0 llvm::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) + 124 > 14 llc 0x08eba415 llvm::PassManager::run(llvm::Module&) + 39 > 15 llc 0x0859a610 main + 2470 > 16 libc.so.6 0x0097de9c __libc_start_main + 220 > 17 llc 0x08598b61 > Stack dump: > 0. Program arguments: llc test.ll -march=SSP -o test.s > 1. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module 'test.ll'. > 2. Running pass 'SSP DAG->DAG Pattern Instruction Selection' on > function '@add' > Segmentation fault > * >This error seems to suggest there is something wrong with how you implement your TargetData field in your TargetMachine subclass.> ** > I think the error comes from the lacking support of function call. Should I > write some fake codes to walk around, or I have some ways to tell LLVM that > I do not want function call? >You do not need to handle call instructions, but you do need to handle parameter passing. A function is the basic unit of compilation in LLVM, and a function can have zero or more parameters, and an output parameter. You need to specify how to lower these parameters. If you always have a function that takes no arguments, and returns nothing, then you can just omit the implementation.> > Actually, I tried to write LLVM IR without the function form of define > @main(..., but with function body directly. Unfortunately, everything seems > must work with a function call, otherwise llc will not work. >Yes, LLVM requires all instructions to be within a block within a function.> > > Best wishes! > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >-- Thanks, Justin Holewinski -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110915/7797a8b2/attachment.html>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [LLVMdev] Fwd: Multiply i8 operands promotes to i32
- [LLVMdev] Limit loop vectorizer to SSE
- [LLVMdev] RFC: Store alignment should be LValue alignment, not source alignment
- [LLVMdev] Possible DAGCombiner or TargetData Bug
- [LLVMdev] MCJIT generates MOVAPS on unaligned address