llvm dev - Mar 2011 - [LLVMdev] Building LLVM on MinGW32 / Windows 7 Professional x64

Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes:
>> I would really appreciate a binary pack for llvm-as, llc, etc.
>
> indeed windows is the only platform for which the LLVM core tools like
> llvm-as, llc etc are not provided in the binary distribution.  I think
> it would be better if they were included.
The only binary distribution related to LLVM 2.8 and Windows on the
Download page is "LLVM-GCC 4.2 Front End Binaries for Mingw32/x86". It
doesn't include llvm-as & co. but the other LLVM-GCC binary
distributions doesn't either (I checked LLVM-GCC 4.2 Front End Binaries
for Linux/x86_64).

On 05/03/11 15:01, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> Duncan Sands<baldrick at free.fr>  writes:
>
>>> I would really appreciate a binary pack for llvm-as, llc, etc.
>>
>> indeed windows is the only platform for which the LLVM core tools like
>> llvm-as, llc etc are not provided in the binary distribution.  I think
>> it would be better if they were included.
>
> The only binary distribution related to LLVM 2.8 and Windows on the
> Download page is "LLVM-GCC 4.2 Front End Binaries for
Mingw32/x86". It
> doesn't include llvm-as&  co. but the other LLVM-GCC binary
> distributions doesn't either (I checked LLVM-GCC 4.2 Front End Binaries
> for Linux/x86_64).
They are bundled in with clang.

Ciao, Duncan.

Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes:
>>> indeed windows is the only platform for which the LLVM core tools
like
>>> llvm-as, llc etc are not provided in the binary distribution.  I
think
>>> it would be better if they were included.
>>
>> The only binary distribution related to LLVM 2.8 and Windows on the
>> Download page is "LLVM-GCC 4.2 Front End Binaries for
Mingw32/x86". It
>> doesn't include llvm-as&  co. but the other LLVM-GCC binary
>> distributions doesn't either (I checked LLVM-GCC 4.2 Front End
Binaries
>> for Linux/x86_64).
>
> They are bundled in with clang.
There is no binary distribution of clang 2.8 for Windows.