Alexey Zakhlestin
2010-Apr-27 10:20 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phoronix: Benchmarking LLVM & Clang Against GCC 4.5
On 27.04.2010, at 12:37, Renato Golin wrote:> On 27 April 2010 08:18, Stefano Delli Ponti > <stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote: >> FYI >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1 > > For Apache and Dhrystone, the performance boost is good (but only the > former is really important), but for the rest, especially those with > image/sound processing, and HMMR, it's still far behind. Is this only > because there is no auto vectorization in LLVM? > > Would be good to know why some programs were not compiled with Clang.yup. it's a bit strange, that they couldn't compile php. I compile php with clang for several months (at least) and it just works -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://www.milkfarmsoft.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2673 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100427/73c12918/attachment.bin>
Renato Golin
2010-Apr-27 10:28 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phoronix: Benchmarking LLVM & Clang Against GCC 4.5
On 27 April 2010 11:20, Alexey Zakhlestin <indeyets at gmail.com> wrote:> yup. > it's a bit strange, that they couldn't compile php. > > I compile php with clang for several months (at least) and it just worksCould be a temporary broken svn version. They could've waited until 2.7 was officially out, couldn't they? ;) cheers, --renato http://systemcall.org/ Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [LLVMdev] Phoronix: Benchmarking LLVM & Clang Against GCC 4.5
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phoronix: Benchmarking LLVM & Clang Against GCC 4.5
- [LLVMdev] Phoronix: Benchmarking LLVM & Clang Against GCC 4.5
- [LLVMdev] Phoronix: Benchmarking LLVM & Clang Against GCC 4.5
- [LLVMdev] FYI: Phoronix GCC vs. LLVM-GCC benchmarks