search for: phoronix

FYI http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=apple_llvm_gcc&num=1 Regards, Stefano

On 27 April 2010 08:18, Stefano Delli Ponti <stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote: > FYI > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1 For Apache and Dhrystone, the performance boost is good (but only the former is really important), but for the rest, especially those with image/sound processing, and HMMR, it's still far behind. Is this only because there is no auto...

On Sep 14, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote: > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php? > page=article&item=apple_llvm_gcc&num=1 Unfortunately, they don't specify what flags are used, what architecture is compiled for etc. It's entirely possible that they are accidentally compiling the llvm-gcc binaries for x86-32 and the gcc ones for x86-64 f...

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 09:37:53AM +0100, Renato Golin wrote: > On 27 April 2010 08:18, Stefano Delli Ponti > <stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote: > > FYI > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1 > > For Apache and Dhrystone, the performance boost is good (but only the > former is really important), but for the rest, especially those with > image/sound processing, and HMMR, it's still far behind. Is this only >...

...tch of the day is. All test reports should also include switches passed to the compiler for each run. Right now this isn't a fair test. It's practically meaningless. Remember, the goal here isn't to show how great LLVM is. It's to get an honest assessment of where we are at. Phoronix did us a big favor. Getting more details about his tests would help us even more. For one thing, we (Cray) have a number of LLVM enhancements geared toward Opteron that make a big difference in performance. I'm planning to contribute much of this to our open source community. So there is...

On Sep 16, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote: > Olivier Meurant: >> I have run the john the ripper test. >> I have used the official archive (same version as phoronix) from >> http://www.openwall.com/john/g/john-1.7.3.1.tar.bz2 >> >> To build with llvm-gcc, replace the line CC = gcc with CC = llvm-gcc. >> I have used the following command to build : make clean linux-x86- >> sse2 >> (seems to be the best on x86-32) >> Th...

And this one, with LLVM ~3.0: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd_bulldozer_compilers&num=1 -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Martin Whitaker Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 11:01 Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev]...

On 27.04.2010, at 12:37, Renato Golin wrote: > On 27 April 2010 08:18, Stefano Delli Ponti > <stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote: >> FYI >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1 > > For Apache and Dhrystone, the performance boost is good (but only the > former is really important), but for the rest, especially those with > image/sound processing, and HMMR, it's still far behind. Is this only >...

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:35 PM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > > Remember, the goal here isn't to show how great LLVM is. It's to get an > honest assessment of where we are at. Phoronix did us a big favor. > Getting > more details about his tests would help us even more. > It's exactly what I'm trying to do. I'm not even a LLVM contributor, so I don't feel responsible for a good or bad performances of LLVM. :) Anyway, thanks for pointing this target diff...

..., Olivier Meurant wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:35 PM, David Greene <dag at cray.com > <mailto:dag at cray.com>> wrote: > > > Remember, the goal here isn't to show how great LLVM is. It's to > get an > honest assessment of where we are at. Phoronix did us a big > favor. Getting > more details about his tests would help us even more. > > > It's exactly what I'm trying to do. I'm not even a LLVM contributor, > so I don't feel responsible for a good or bad performances of LLVM. :) > Anyway, thanks fo...

screw that site, its useless info run by a linux gnu zealot. 2009/9/14 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>: > On Sep 14, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote: > >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php? >> page=article&item=apple_llvm_gcc&num=1 > > Unfortunately, they don't specify what flags are used, what > architecture is compiled for etc.  It's entirely possible that they > are accidentally compiling the llvm-gcc binaries for x86-32 and the >...

AMD is dropping support for the R300-R500 cards in their official drivers: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd_r500_legacy&num=1 As the current open source drivers do not support 3D, I'd like to know which Compiz effects use 3D and which use 2D. Thanks. -- Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il ?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-...

Olivier Meurant: > I have run the john the ripper test. > I have used the official archive (same version as phoronix) from > http://www.openwall.com/john/g/john-1.7.3.1.tar.bz2 > > To build with llvm-gcc, replace the line CC = gcc with CC = llvm-gcc. > I have used the following command to build : make clean linux-x86-sse2 > (seems to be the best on x86-32) > The makefile invocation is "g...

Michael Johnson <mpj at rowley.co.uk> writes: > Hi Rafael, >> Michael Johnson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >> >>> Hi Rui, >>> >>> Are there any plans to support the -defsym command line option? >> It doesn't look that hard, it was just never requested. What project is >> using it? > Not sure I understand

...On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:35 PM, David Greene <dag at cray.com > > <mailto:dag at cray.com>> wrote: > > > > > > Remember, the goal here isn't to show how great LLVM is. It's to > > get an > > honest assessment of where we are at. Phoronix did us a big > > favor. Getting > > more details about his tests would help us even more. > > > > > > It's exactly what I'm trying to do. I'm not even a LLVM contributor, > > so I don't feel responsible for a good or bad performances of L...

Hi All, Could anyone point me to some good benchmarking tools to measure the runtime performance of clang compiled C++ applications. Thanks ! - Jyoti -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131003/3cc029f1/attachment.html>

Can you say a Virtualized Asterisk with a PRI card! http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTY0OQ Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

I have run the john the ripper test. I have used the official archive (same version as phoronix) from http://www.openwall.com/john/g/john-1.7.3.1.tar.bz2 To build with llvm-gcc, replace the line CC = gcc with CC = llvm-gcc. I have used the following command to build : make clean linux-x86-sse2 (seems to be the best on x86-32) The makefile invocation is "gcc -c -Wall -O2 -fomit-frame-poi...

Hi everyone, I have replayed the "unix benchmark v3.6 dhrystone 2" test. You can find the archive of the test here : http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/benchmark-files/byte-benchmark-1.tar.gz To play the test on gcc : make ./Run dhry2 To play the test on llvm-gcc : Replace in Makefile : CC=gcc by CC=llvm-gcc in Run : CC=gcc by CC=llvm-gcc make ./Run dhry2 Some information on the test platform : cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubun...