For 2.6 to really be a useful, we need this bug fixed: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4963 Would it be possible to get this merged into 2.6? -Tomas
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:> For 2.6 to really be a useful, we need this bug fixed: > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4963 > > Would it be possible to get this merged into 2.6?While we're at it, what about: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3239 This is a real nuisance, as people regularly build LLVM in a way (--enable-pic, which even is the default now) which makes the JIT create wrong code on x86-32. I've seen this on Ubuntu and Fedora Core 10 (thankfully Michel Salim has fixed the FC LLVM packages now). Albert -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany Email: Dr.Graef at t-online.de, ag at muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag
On Sep 15, 2009, at 7:57 AM, Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:> For 2.6 to really be a useful, we need this bug fixed: > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4963 > > Would it be possible to get this merged into 2.6?I requested it to be merged in, thanks. -Chris
Albert Graef wrote:> Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote: > >> For 2.6 to really be a useful, we need this bug fixed: >> >> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4963 >> >> Would it be possible to get this merged into 2.6? >> > > While we're at it, what about: > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3239 > > This is a real nuisance, as people regularly build LLVM in a way > (--enable-pic, which even is the default now) which makes the JIT create > wrong code on x86-32. I've seen this on Ubuntu and Fedora Core 10 > (thankfully Michel Salim has fixed the FC LLVM packages now). >I think this one is fixed already in TOT. Paul
Hello, Albert> While we're at it, what about: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3239 > > This is a real nuisance, as people regularly build LLVM in a way > (--enable-pic, which even is the default now) which makes the JIT create > wrong code on x86-32. I've seen this on Ubuntu and Fedora Core 10 > (thankfully Michel Salim has fixed the FC LLVM packages now).This is dup of PR3801. Much better fix (as attached to PR) was already integrated into 2.6 & mainline. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University