llvm dev - Mar 2009 - [LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 57, Issue 51

Hi Evan,
>>Is it possible to implement it without using MachineModuleInfo?
but llvm-2.5 didn't ,  if implement it without using MachineModuleInfo, so
I should create another ADT, but that is mostly same to MachineModuleInfo,
that's repeat work! or less cost  for me !
>> It's being removed.
if so, what's the replacement  of the MachineModuleInfo ?


zhangzw

On Mar 26, 2009, at 6:09 PM, zhengjian zhang wrote:
> Hi Evan,
>
>>> Is it possible to implement it without using MachineModuleInfo?
>
> but llvm-2.5 didn't ,  if implement it without using  
> MachineModuleInfo, so
> I should create another ADT, but that is mostly same to  
> MachineModuleInfo,
> that's repeat work! or less cost  for me !
That's fine if you want to use MMI for now. But it's likely to be  
removed in the future. If you contribute your code back to mainline.  
We'll make sure it won't get broken.
>
>
>>> It's being removed.
> if so, what's the replacement  of the MachineModuleInfo ?
There isn't. It's just unnecessary.

Evan
>
>
>
> zhangzw