search for: vol

...s: http://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Geo%20Replication/ Both master and slave clusters are replicated with just two machines (VM) and no arbiter. I have setup a geo-user (called geouser) and do not use root as the geo user, as specified in the docs. Both my master and slave volumes are named: vol If I pause the geo-replication with: gluster volume geo-replication vol geouser at ggluster1-geo::vol pause Pausing geo-replication session between vol & geouser at ggluster1-geo::vol has been successful Create a snapshot: gluster snapshot create my_snap_no_1000 vol snapsho...

All, I am new to gluster and have some questions/concerns about some tiering errors that I see in the log files. OS: CentOs 7.3.1611 Gluster version: 3.10.5 Samba version: 4.6.2 I see the following (scrubbed): Node 1 /var/log/glusterfs/tier/<vol>/tierd.log: [2017-10-19 17:52:07.519614] I [MSGID: 109038] [tier.c:1169:tier_migrate_using_query_file] 0-<vol>-tier-dht: Promotion failed for <file>(gfid:edaf97e1-02e0- 4838-9d26-71ea3aab22fb) [2017-10-19 17:52:07.525110] E [MSGID: 109011] [dht-common.c:7188:dht_create] 0-<vol&gt...

Herb, What are the high and low watermarks for the tier set at ? # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-hi # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-low What is the size of the file that failed to migrate as per the following tierd log: [2017-10-19 17:52:07.519614] I [MSGID: 109038] [tier.c:1169:tier_migrate_using_query_file] 0-<vol>-tier-dht: Pr...

There are several messages "no space left on device". I would check first that free disk space is available for the volume. On Oct 22, 2017 18:42, "Milind Changire" <mchangir at redhat.com> wrote: > Herb, > What are the high and low watermarks for the tier set at ? > > # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-hi > > # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-low...

Milind - Thank you for the response.. >> What are the high and low watermarks for the tier set at ? # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-hi Option Value ------ ----- cluster.watermark-hi 90 # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-low Option Value ------...

...Administrator%20Guide/Geo%20Replication/ > > Both master and slave clusters are replicated with just two > machines (VM) and no arbiter. > > I have setup a geo-user (called geouser) and do not use > root as the geo user, as specified in the docs. > > Both my master and slave volumes are named: vol > > If I pause the geo-replication with: > gluster volume geo-replication vol geouser at ggluster1-geo::vol pause > Pausing geo-replication session between vol & geouser at ggluster1-geo::vol > has been successful > > Create a snapshot: > gluster snaps...

...und it a bit ambiguous w.r.t. state of affairs. -- Milind On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:34 PM, Herb Burnswell < herbert.burnswell at gmail.com> wrote: > Milind - Thank you for the response.. > > >> What are the high and low watermarks for the tier set at ? > > # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-hi > Option Value > > ------ ----- > > cluster.watermark-hi 90 > > > # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-low > Option...

RPM: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4.0alpha2/ SRC: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.4.0alpha2.tar.gz This release is made off jenkins-release-19 -- Gluster Build System _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel at nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Hi Nithya, I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: [root at stor1 ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 /dev/sdc1 50T 16T 34T 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 stor1data:/volumedisk0 101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 stor1data:/volumedisk1 197T 61T 136T 31% /volumedisk1 [root at stor2 ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mou...

...> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: > > That is good to hear. > [root at stor1 ~]# df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 > /dev/sdc1 50T 16T 34T 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 > stor1data:/volumedisk0 > 101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 > stor1data:/volumedisk1 > 197T 61T 136T 31% /volumedisk1 > > > [root at stor2 ~]# df -h > File...

Hi Nithya, My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks per volume). Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance force' operation. This task finished successfully (you can see info below) and number of files on the 3 nodes were very similar . For volumedisk1 I only have files o...

Hi Jose, There is a known issue with gluster 3.12.x builds (see [1]) so you may be running into this. The "shared-brick-count" values seem fine on stor1. Please send us "grep -n "share" /var/lib/glusterd/vols/volumedisk1/*" results for the other nodes so we can check if they are the cause. Regards, Nithya [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260 On 28 February 2018 at 03:03, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Some days ago all my glusterfs...

Hi, Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was working fine. Today I realized that the total size reported by df command was changed and is smaller than the aggregated capacity of all the bricks in the volume. I checked that all the volumes status are fine, all the glusterd daemons are running, there is no error in logs, however df shows a bad total size. My configuration for one volume: volumedisk1 [root at stor1 ~]# gluster volume status volumedisk1 detail Status of volume: volumedisk1 -------...

Does anyone have any ideas about how to fix, or to work-around the following issue? Thanks! Bug 1549714 - On sharded tiered volume, only first shard of new file goes on hot tier. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549714 On sharded tiered volume, only first shard of new file goes on hot tier. On a sharded tiered volume, only the first shard of a new file goes on the hot tier, the rest are written to the cold tie...

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 22:31, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. > A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks > per volume). > Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance > force' operation. This task finished successfully (you can see info below) > and number of files on the 3 nodes were very similar . > > For vo...

Hi Nithya, Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- -------...

Hi, I have a cluster of 10 servers all running Fedora 24 along with Gluster 3.8. I'm planning on doing rolling upgrades to Fedora 27 with Gluster 3.12. I saw the documentation and did some testing but I would like to run my plan through some (more?) educated minds. The current setup is: Volume Name: vol0 Distributed-Replicate Number of Bricks: 2 x (2 + 1) = 6 Bricks: Brick1: glt01:/vol/vol0 Brick2: glt02:/vol/vol0 Brick3: glt05:/vol/vol0 (arbiter) Brick4: glt03:/vol/vol0 Brick5: glt04:/vol/vol0 Brick6: glt06:/vol/vol0 (arbiter) Volume Name: vol1 Distributed-Replicate Number of Bricks...

Here is a clean version. I did this with nls and it works (see below), but I need to do it with optim. Keun-Hyung # optim vol<-rep(c(0.03, 0.5, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32), 3) time<-rep(c(2,4,8),each=7) p.mated<-c(0.47, 0.48, 0.43, 0.43, 0.26, 0.23, NA, 0.68, 0.62, 0.64, 0.58, 0.53, 0.47, 0.24, 0.8, 0.79, 0.71, 0.56, 0.74, 0.8, 0.47) eury<-data.frame(vol=vol, time=time, p.mated=p.mated) eury<-na.omit(eury); eury p0&l...

...s morning. The scp command works flawlessly as ever. $ bin/rsync_ldslnx01rhythmbox.sh sending incremental file list sent 268 bytes received 15 bytes 188.67 bytes/sec total size is 1,467,438 speedup is 5,185.29 sending incremental file list Alfred Brendel/ Alfred Brendel/Beethoven Piano Sonatas Vol I/ Alfred Brendel/Beethoven Piano Sonatas Vol I/Disc 1 - 01 - Piano Sonata No. 29 in B-flat major, op. 106 "Hammerklavier": I. Allegro.mp3 12,279,216 100% 13.53MB/s 0:00:00 (xfr#1, ir-chk=1025/1221) Alfred Brendel/Beethoven Piano Sonatas Vol I/Disc 1 - 02 - Piano Sonata No. 29...

Team, **Please respond to me and my coworker listed in the Cc, since neither one of us are on this alias** QUICK PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: Cu created a dataset which contains all the zvols for a particular zone. The zone is then given access to all the zvols in the dataset using a match statement in the zoneconfig (see long problem description for details). After the initial boot of the zone everything appears fine and the localzone zvol dev files match the globalzone zvol dev fil...