Albert Graef
2009-Jan-17 21:25 UTC
[LLVMdev] Criticism of garbage collection support in LLVM
Chris Lattner wrote:> In the end, I consider this to be a yet-another chapter in the > "functional language people don't like LLVM" saga.Yet another counterexample: http://pure-lang.googlecode.com/ LLVM from the ground up, proper tail calls, interactive interpreter, JIT, easy C interface. Works great. :) Without LLVM, I could have never pulled that off in a couple of months. Albert -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany Email: Dr.Graef at t-online.de, ag at muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag
Chris Lattner
2009-Jan-18 00:27 UTC
[LLVMdev] Criticism of garbage collection support in LLVM
On Jan 17, 2009, at 1:25 PM, Albert Graef wrote:> Chris Lattner wrote: >> In the end, I consider this to be a yet-another chapter in the >> "functional language people don't like LLVM" saga. > > Yet another counterexample: > > http://pure-lang.googlecode.com/Hey, this is incredibly cool. I had never heard of pure, nice work! Would you mind writing a blurb for this page? http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/> LLVM from the ground up, proper tail calls, interactive interpreter, > JIT, easy C interface. Works great. :) Without LLVM, I could have > never > pulled that off in a couple of months.That's very nice. Do you (or anyone else out there that I don't know about :) want to be mentioned in the LLVM 2.5 release notes? I am happy to have the LLVM 2.5 release notes and announcement mention and link to (active and well maintained) projects like this! Incidentally, my comment about functional language people hating LLVM wasn't meant as a universal statement. I'm thrilled that there are people using and liking it, please help spread the good word! :) -Chris
Csaba Hruska
2009-Jan-18 00:35 UTC
[LLVMdev] Criticism of garbage collection support in LLVM
Hi! Essential Haskell Compiler (EHC) also has llvm backend. http://www.cs.uu.nl/wiki/bin/view/Ehc/WebHome http://www.cs.uu.nl/wiki/bin/view/Stc/CompilingHaskellToLLVM Cheers, Csaba -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090118/33489dd6/attachment.html>
Albert Graef
2009-Jan-18 10:47 UTC
[LLVMdev] Criticism of garbage collection support in LLVM
Chris Lattner wrote:> Hey, this is incredibly cool. I had never heard of pure, nice work!Thanks. I only just started to write about it as we're getting close to version 1.0 now, so you might hear more about it in the future. ;-)> Would you mind writing a blurb for this page? > http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/Here goes: Pure (http://pure-lang.googlecode.com/) is an algebraic/functional programming language based on term rewriting. Programs are collections of equations which are used to evaluate expressions in a symbolic fashion. Pure offers dynamic typing, eager and lazy evaluation, lexical closures, a hygienic macro system (also based on term rewriting), built-in list and matrix support (including list and matrix comprehensions) and an easy-to-use C interface. The interpreter uses LLVM as a backend to JIT-compile Pure programs to fast native code. In addition to the usual algebraic data structures, Pure also has MATLAB-style matrices in order to support numeric computations and signal processing in an efficient way. Pure is mainly aimed at mathematical applications right now, but it has been designed as a general purpose language. The dynamic interpreter environment and the C interface make it possible to use it as a kind of functional scripting language for many application areas. (Please feel free to edit for editorial purposes.)> That's very nice. Do you (or anyone else out there that I don't know > about :) want to be mentioned in the LLVM 2.5 release notes?Sure, that would be nice!> Incidentally, my comment about functional language people hating LLVM > wasn't meant as a universal statement. I'm thrilled that there are > people using and liking it, please help spread the good word! :)Will do. But I think that if there are any compiler writers who haven't heard about LLVM yet then they must have been hiding under a rock. :) Cheers, Albert -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany Email: Dr.Graef at t-online.de, ag at muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [LLVMdev] Criticism of garbage collection support in LLVM
- [LLVMdev] Criticism of garbage collection support in LLVM
- [LLVMdev] Calling functions defined in .o files in LLVM code executed in lli
- [LLVMdev] Calling functions defined in .o files in LLVM code executed in lli
- [LLVMdev] LLVM for functional languages?