Edward Lee
2008-Apr-18 18:43 UTC
[LLVMdev] Giving labels to intrinsics and getting the address
call void @llvm.branchlike(label %thelabel) Is it possible to give a label/BasicBlock* to an intrinsic? Similar to labels for branches. No label type is currently defined in Intrinsics.td, but would it be possible to add it there and ValueTypes.td? But I also want to take the address and put it into a physical register and emit a desired x86 instruction. Assuming I have the label, I should be able to do this in the Lowering process with inline asm. Where I want the x86 instruction to be "0x0f, 0x36, 0x00" and label address put into register a. // Get the label from instrinsic's arguments.. BasicBlock* theLabel = ...magic?... // Create a function type that takes a label and returns void std::vector<const Type*>asmArgs; asmArgs.push_back(Type::LabelTy); FunctionType* asmFuncTy = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, asmArgs, false); // Create inline asm that emits the desired opcode and prepares register a InlineAsm* asm = InlineAsm::get(asmFuncTy, ".byte 0x0f, 0x36, 0x00", "{ax},~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags},~{memory}", true); // Create call to the inline asm giving "the label" to put in register a CallInst* callAsm = new CallInst(asm, theLabel); // Replace the intrinsic with the call CI->replaceAllUsesWith(callAsm); Actually, now that I think about it, maybe I shouldn't even bother using an intrinsic and directly use this inline asm. Assuming that the following transformation won't cause basic blocks to be considered dead. %x = call i1 @llvm.myintrinsic(label %otherPath) ; @myintrinsic always returns true br i1 %x, label %mainPath, label %otherPath Hopefully, even if the CFG optimizer finds that mainPath is always taken, because there's a use of %otherPath by @myintrinsic, that path won't be used. Additionally, to the rest of the compiler, data (e.g., %x) flows into *both* %mainPath and %otherPath. Ed
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLVMdev] CodeGen fails for CallInst with label
- [LLVMdev] CodeGen fails for CallInst with label
- [LLVMdev] Marking source locations without interfering with optimization?
- [LLVMdev] Marking source locations without interfering with optimization?
- [LLVMdev] Marking source locations without interfering with optimization?