search for: sln

...t problem symptom. The data is from the DC. total 80 drwxr-xr-x. 7 root root 4096 Oct 9 01:15 . drwx------+ 77 SAMDOM\prg-11868bg SAMDOM\domain users 20480 Oct 9 00:55 prg-11868bg drwx------+ 39 3001108 SAMDOM\domain users 4096 Oct 9 00:30 sln-11868bg Note that the directory sln-11868bg is owned by 3001108 instead of SAMDOM\sln-11868bg. But everything seems like it should be correct. For example: > getent passwd sln-11868bg SAMDOM\sln-11868bg:*:3001108:3000513:John Q. Public:/home/sln-11868bg:/bin/bash > samba-tool user li...

Hi all, I've been notified of a CVE to be publish against FLAC early next week. I have a patch for it and have thoroughly tested it as well as had it verified by the Google Security Team member who found it. I've been asked not to publish that patch until Tuesday. Once I publis the patch, I like to release FLAC 1.3.1 immediately and would therefore like to make sure that all the

Please, don't remove, I'm using!!! Regards, Makslane > From: snaroff at apple.com > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu > Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:09:13 -0800 > Subject: [cfe-dev] win32/llvm.sln, win32/clang.sln > > Folks, > > Is anyone still using the Visual Studio solution files in the win32 > directory? > > If they aren't being maintained, they should probably be removed (to > avoid any confusion). > > Thanks for any feedback, > > snaroff...

...DC. > > total 80 > drwxr-xr-x. 7 root root 4096 Oct 9 > 01:15 . > drwx------+ 77 SAMDOM\prg-11868bg SAMDOM\domain users 20480 Oct 9 > 00:55 prg-11868bg > drwx------+ 39 3001108 SAMDOM\domain users 4096 Oct 9 > 00:30 sln-11868bg > > Note that the directory sln-11868bg is owned by 3001108 instead of > SAMDOM\sln-11868bg. But everything seems like it should be correct. > For example: > > > getent passwd sln-11868bg > SAMDOM\sln-11868bg:*:3001108:3000513:John Q. > Public:/home/sln-11868...

...vm-as/opt/llvm-dis/tablegen and a few others. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of steve naroff Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 4:09 PM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: [LLVMdev] win32/llvm.sln, win32/clang.sln Folks, Is anyone still using the Visual Studio solution files in the win32 directory? If they aren't being maintained, they should probably be removed (to avoid any confusion). Thanks for any feedback, snaroff _______________________________________________ LLVM Develo...

...with cmake. Gab > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of steve naroff > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 1:09 AM > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: [LLVMdev] win32/llvm.sln, win32/clang.sln > > Folks, > > Is anyone still using the Visual Studio solution files in the win32 > directory? > > If they aren't being maintained, they should probably be removed (to > avoid any confusion). > > Thanks for any feedback, > > snaroff &gt...

Makslane Araújo Rodrigues <makslane at hotmail.com> writes: > Please, don't remove, I'm using!!! What's preventing you from using CMake? Is there some problem we can solve? -- Oscar

I cannot see my post with a patch for FLAC.sln (too long?) Here I repeat this message, with patch file compressed to .zip: --------------------------------------------------------------- Every time I open current FLAC.sln in MSVS 2005, it rewrites (fixes) this file. The diff between new and old files is attached. Current version has several...

lvqcl wrote: > 1) > Current MSVC solution (FLAC.sln and numerous .vcproj files) was made with > VC2005 Express and doesn't allow to build 64-bit files/libraries. > > IMHO it's time to add 64-bit support for MSVC builds, but AFAIK only Visual Studio > 2012/2013 Express are free and allow to build 64-bit files. > > VS 2005/...

Folks, Is anyone still using the Visual Studio solution files in the win32 directory? If they aren't being maintained, they should probably be removed (to avoid any confusion). Thanks for any feedback, snaroff

...king ones in the 2.5 release... Cheers, Nicolas -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of steve naroff Sent: donderdag 15 januari 2009 1:09 To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: [LLVMdev] win32/llvm.sln, win32/clang.sln Folks, Is anyone still using the Visual Studio solution files in the win32 directory? If they aren't being maintained, they should probably be removed (to avoid any confusion). Thanks for any feedback, snaroff _______________________________________________ LLVM Develo...

> > I just moved to the CMake solution. By the way, the generated libs > > haven't the same names. > > Which ones? The only difference is that we now generate .lib files > where > .obj were generated on the past, and require a parameter to be passed > to > the linker for including them on the final executable. I was linking with VMCore.lib support.lib

Hi All, I'm going to be upgrading our 1.2 Asterisk system. At the moment we use the Enicomms SLN files. Are there major differences in the 1.4 default voicefile packs, or will I be able to re-use Enicomms?? In the Make menuselect, I noticed theres no .SLN voicefile selection for the basic audiofiles - has SLN been depreciated? Thanks Adrian

Hi Steve, On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, steve naroff wrote: > For development, CMake is working great for me. I rarely get build > errors related to the project file being out-of-date. > > Is it true that CMake only generates absolute paths? Any idea on the > difficulty of generating relative paths? I consider this a pretty big > obstacle... I did not follow the full-thread, just

...re are the steps to compile libtheora, dump_video, and encoder_example: 1. Download libogg-1.2.2.zip <http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/ogg/libogg-1.2.2.zip> and unpack the zip file into a folder, let say d:\build 2. Build libogg by launching d:\build\libogg-1.2.2\win32\VS2008\libogg_static.sln 3. Download libvorbis-1.3.2.zip <http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/vorbis/libvorbis-1.3.2.zip> and unpack it to d:\build 4. Edit d:\build\libvorbis-1.3.2\win32\VS2008\libogg.vsprops and change LIBOGG_VERSION from 1.1.4 to 1.2.2 5. Build libvorbis by launching d:\build\libvorbis-1.3.2\win...

Hi all, It sees that the most serious bug in the flac bug tracker: https://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/413/ has been fixed in git. This fix alone is worth a new release so its time to work towards one. Things I need to do for this new release: * Deal with all current patches on the mailing list. * Review all bugs reported against 1.3.0 on the sf.net. * Testing and coordination of testing

Mondada Gabriele <g.mondada at etel.ch> writes: > I just moved to the CMake solution. By the way, the generated libs > haven't the same names. Which ones? The only difference is that we now generate .lib files where .obj were generated on the past, and require a parameter to be passed to the linker for including them on the final executable. > In my opinion, we have to choose

Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> writes: >>> Please, don't remove, I'm using!!! >> >> What's preventing you from using CMake? >> >> Is there some problem we can solve? > > At some point, we'll need to deal with the testing issue in the CMake > build system. Clang, for example, uses some GNU make magic to run its > tests,

Hi, How do I listen to .sln audio file or convert it to some format that can listened to? Sox does not seems to support .sln as an input file. Thanks. - Andrew

On Jan 15, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Makslane Araújo Rodrigues > <makslane at hotmail.com> writes: > >> Please, don't remove, I'm using!!! > > What's preventing you from using CMake? > > Is there some problem we can solve? At some point, we'll need to deal with the testing issue in the CMake build system. Clang, for example, uses