Is there an explicit document describing how to do LLVM with Cygwin? Or with Solaris Dev Express? And is LLVM considered a “safe” replacement for gcc on MacOS? In other words, if I’m doing some ObjC and C/C++ on the MacOS, if I drop LLVM in, is it going to create some strange kinds of heartache later on? Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing HYPERLINK "http://www.tedneward.com"http://www.tedneward.com No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.0/1216 - Release Date: 1/9/2008 10:16 AM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080109/358661c0/attachment.html>
On Jan 9, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Ted Neward wrote:> Is there an explicit document describing how to do LLVM with > Cygwin? Or with Solaris Dev Express? >No, not really. There are some docs on mingw and LLVM (see mailing list and the wiki) and some posts about cygwin on the mailing list. Nothing official for either.> And is LLVM considered a “safe” replacement for gcc on MacOS? In > other words, if I’m doing some ObjC and C/C++ on the MacOS, if I > drop LLVM in, is it going to create some strange kinds of heartache > later on? >I'm not sure what you mean by heartache. LLVM is used to compile many programs (see the Nightly Tester for a list of programs and benchmarks that are compiled every night). The best thing you can do is try it out and see how it works for you. If you did happen to come across a bug, the advantage of LLVM is that they usually get fixed very quickly. -Tanya> Ted Neward > > Java, .NET, XML Services > > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > > http://www.tedneward.com > > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.0/1216 - Release Date: > 1/9/2008 10:16 AM > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080109/d30adef5/attachment.html>
Hey Ted, I managed to get LLVM and clang to compile and run on Nexenta (OpenSolaris with GNU tools). llvm-gcc was a pain and I didn't have time to set up a proper config/build process for it. Check here: http://www.nabble.com/LLVM-builds-on-x86-64-Solaris-td13844820.html I sent Chris Lattner a patch file with a few dozen changes for clang/LLVM a few weeks back. I don't think they made it into the code base yet, but there isn't much demand for LLVM on OpenSolaris ;) I could send you the patch file if you really need it, or maybe Chris still has it. Clang won't generate code for much right now and llvm-gcc isn't easy to get running, but it can be done. Anyways, if it can be done on Nexenta, I imagine it can be done for OpenSolaris Dev Express. Thanks, K.Wilson On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 20:52 -0800, Ted Neward wrote:> Is there an explicit document describing how to do LLVM with Cygwin? > Or with Solaris Dev Express? > > > > And is LLVM considered a “safe” replacement for gcc on MacOS? In other > words, if I’m doing some ObjC and C/C++ on the MacOS, if I drop LLVM > in, is it going to create some strange kinds of heartache later on? > > > > Ted Neward > > Java, .NET, XML Services > > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > > http://www.tedneward.com > > > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.0/1216 - Release Date: > 1/9/2008 10:16 AM > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reasonably Related Threads
- [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
- [LLVMdev] Question on link error
- [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
- [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
- [LLVMdev] Question on link error