llvm dev - Nov 2007 - [LLVMdev] Are 'make check' failures of interest in llvm-gcc?

Hi,

I have run 'make check' in llvm-gcc 4.0 (svn version).
I got some failures, mostly gcc.apple tests fail (and a gcc.c-torture
test, namely 20000804-1.c)

Are these tests of any interest to llvm-gcc itself, or they are problems
with "upstream" ? (gcc 4.0).
If the former, should I submit bugreports about them?

Thanks,
--Edwin

On Nov 15, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have run 'make check' in llvm-gcc 4.0 (svn version).
> I got some failures, mostly gcc.apple tests fail (and a gcc.c-torture
> test, namely 20000804-1.c)
>
> Are these tests of any interest to llvm-gcc itself, or they are  
> problems
> with "upstream" ? (gcc 4.0).
> If the former, should I submit bugreports about them?
Could be either.  I'm running this suite and seeing a lot more  
failures than
you're reporting; many builtin optimizations are not done, many expected
warnings do not match gcc syntax, etc.  There are also some real bugs,
but all the ones I know of are related to rarely used features,  
mostly gcc
extensions.

It would be more useful to do this in 4.2 IMO.

Dale Johannesen wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
>   
> Could be either.  I'm running this suite and seeing a lot more  
> failures than
> you're reporting;
I didn't wait for all the tests to finish, just seen that there are many...
>  many builtin optimizations are not done, many expected
> warnings do not match gcc syntax, etc.  There are also some real bugs,
> but all the ones I know of are related to rarely used features,  
> mostly gcc
> extensions.
>
> It would be more useful to do this in 4.2 IMO.
>   
Ok.

--Edwin