We have a need for 3 element vector support. Locally I've added a new type to MVT to support this. Is there any reason this shouldn't be contributed back to the mainline? -- Christopher Lamb -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070422/6c6cb075/attachment.html>
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Christopher Lamb wrote:> We have a need for 3 element vector support. Locally I've added a new type to > MVT to support this. Is there any reason this shouldn't be contributed back > to the mainline?That sounds good to me. There are various assumptions that the vectors will be a power of two (mostly in the legalizer), that will need to be fixed. However, non-power-of-two vectors would be a great improvement and definitely good for mainline. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [LLVMdev] bitconvert for multi-typed RegisterClasses
- [LLVMdev] bitconvert for multi-typed RegisterClasses
- [LLVMdev] bitconvert for multi-typed RegisterClasses
- [LLVMdev] bitconvert for multi-typed RegisterClasses
- [LLVMdev] Status of pre-legalize vector changes