On Sat, 13 May 2006, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> in LLVM CVS the above methods returns pointer to TargetData. It used to
> return a reference before. What is semantic of 0 return value? Or
> returning 0 is always a bug? If so, why pointer, and not reference is
> returned?
We are currently in the process of making it optional, but right now it is
required. In practice, all targets will be *required* to provide it (it's
hard to do much of anything without knowing how to lay out data :) ), but
it will give us flexibility in the future, for mid-level passes that want
to use data layout info if available, but gracefully degrade if not.
-Chris
--
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/