search for: volodya

...t you can with vorbis comment are: 1. run a command and then enter the tags from console 2. use error codes in the same way If anybody has any suggestions on changes or additions to these scripts, let me know. They are GPL3-ed, so you can use them and pass them along if you like. - Volodya -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: oggz-comments Url: http://lists.xiph.org/piper...

Sounds good! Though maybe calling it oggz-metadata might make more sense? Cheers, Silvia. On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 1:42 PM, VolodyA! V Anarhist <Volodya at whengendarmesleeps.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I've sent one of these before, but i wasn't subscribed, and i'm unsure if it > went out. I'm subscribed now and i've written another (i believe) nifty > wrapper for oggz-tools. > > oggz-c...

Reid Spencer wrote: > Volodya, > > I think you may need to update your CFE and rebuild. I compiled the test > using my local build and I didn't get the results you see below. I'm > also very surprised to see this output. The first %tmp.11 should have > been %tmp.1 .. not sure how it got corrupted. In any...

...} This passes 'long long' value to 'ld' format specifier -- but for that specifier the parameter should be 'long'. So, the behaviour of the above is undefined and in fact it produces wrong results with my backend. Could extra 'l' be added in the format string? - Volodya

...ommand not found Two questions. 1. Why install process requires some nonstandard tool? Is it possible to get away without it. 2. autoconf/configure.ac has this: AC_PATH_PROG(PAX, [pax], [pax]) but Makefile.rules uses plain 'pax', not $(PAX). Why autoconf test is needed, then? - Volodya

Okay, let me test with exactly your options and I'll let you know what I get. Reid. On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 19:53:15 +0400 Vladimir Prus <ghost at cs.msu.su> wrote: > Reid Spencer wrote: >> Volodya, >> >> I think you may need to update your CFE and rebuild. I compiled the test >> using my local build and I didn't get the results you see below. I'm >> also very surprised to see this output. The first %tmp.11 should have >> been %tmp.1 .. not sure how it go...

...ng easier. I see some number of such small tests in "test/Feature" directory, but there's no Makefile, so I don't know how they are run, and most of the tests don't even have "main" function, so I don't know if they are supposed to be run. Any suggestions? - Volodya

...#39;t been able to try using oggSilence because when I specify a bitrate at or above 128Kbps, the utility crashes. Has anybody else experienced this? On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 1:00 PM, <ogg-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:47:07 +0400 > From: Volodya <Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> > Subject: Re: [ogg-dev] Using oggCat > To: List - Ogg Development <ogg-dev at xiph.org> > Message-ID: <4CBE825B.7070908 at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > I am sorry if i am...

...assembler, compile it and run. The only thing I don't see if the expected outputs from the tests -- so that I don't need to look at each test and figure out what it should output. Is it true such expected outputs are not available? I not, I'll probably do some automation myself. - Volodya

Hi, the insertBefore parameter, present in all constructors, is declared like this: Instruction *InsertBefore=0 any reason there's no "const" before "Instruction" ? - Volodya

Volodya, This program is in error. Either the format specifier needs to be %lld or the argument value X needs to be casted to type long. This will compile fine but it probably won't work at runtime because printf is expecting a long, not a long long. I think your backend producing "wrong results...

...tioned test contains this: long B53 = - (1LL << 53); strictly speaking, this is not correct code. The C standard says about shift: "if the value of the first operator is ... or greater than ... the width of the promoted left operand, the behaviour is underfined". Thouhts? - Volodya

...d Spencer" <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Okay, let me test with exactly your options and I'll let you know what I >get. > > Reid. > > On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 19:53:15 +0400 > Vladimir Prus <ghost at cs.msu.su> wrote: >> Reid Spencer wrote: >>> Volodya, >>> >>> I think you may need to update your CFE and rebuild. I compiled the test >>> using my local build and I didn't get the results you see below. I'm >>> also very surprised to see this output. The first %tmp.11 should have >>> been %tmp.1 ....

...d, > Instructions are members of a linked list. Consequently if you insert > some Instruction, that instruction gets changed. So, its not const. > > Simple enough? Yes, thank you. I started thinking if "mutable" is right here, but that's long philosophical issue ;-) - Volodya

.... This does not work. The Mem2Reg pass requires TargetData which does not seem to be available. The only reason why it requires it, is to pass to lib/Transforms/Utils/PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp:isAllocaPromotable, which does not use that data at all. Could anybody suggest a better solution? - Volodya

...lt;uint> [#uses= %tmp.7 = cast ulong %tmp.11 to int ; <int> [#uses=7 %tmp.9 = cast ulong %tmp.11 to ushort ; <ushort> [#use %tmp.11 = cast ulong %tmp.11 to short Am I missing something, or there's duplicate assignment to %tmp.11? - Volodya

Folks, With some MacOS help from Nate, I've begun the conversion of LLVM to use lib/System, the operating system independence layer. Currently, the library has implementations for three abstractions: Path, Program, and Signals. These provide some basic utilities for manipulating file system paths, finding and executing programs, and cleaning up after Signals. The implementations should work

.../home/ghost/Build/llvm/Release/bin/tblgen: In anonymous.24: frameindex node requires exactly 0 operands! Is this really as designed, or nobody got around to making frameindex have an true operand? Any way to achive frameindex->add translation using a pattern and not C++ code at all? - Volodya

...implementation and be pure, so that derived class authors are forced to think how they want this method to behave, and still have the option to call the default implementation. 2. What are possible reasons for *not* using the default implementation? X86 has completely different code, why? Thanks, Volodya

Hi, Does anyone know of any projects that would allow you to use Redis in place of AstDB? By in place of I don't mean for what Asterisk needs but to store values. For instance for CNAM currently we need to use an AGI to connect to redis to pull CNAM. So in place of: Set(CALLERID(name)=${DB(CNAM/${CALLERID(num)})} it would be done with redis for example: