On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:38:22 +0530 Pankaj Gupta <pagupta at redhat.com> wrote:> This patch adds virtio-pmem driver for KVM guest. > > Guest reads the persistent memory range information from > Qemu over VIRTIO and registers it on nvdimm_bus. It also > creates a nd_region object with the persistent memory > range information so that existing 'nvdimm/pmem' driver > can reserve this into system memory map. This way > 'virtio-pmem' driver uses existing functionality of pmem > driver to register persistent memory compatible for DAX > capable filesystems. > > This also provides function to perform guest flush over > VIRTIO from 'pmem' driver when userspace performs flush > on DAX memory range. > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 10 +++ > drivers/virtio/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/virtio/pmem.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 60 +++++++++++++++ > include/uapi/linux/virtio_ids.h | 1 + > include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 10 +++ > 7 files changed, 294 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c > create mode 100644 drivers/virtio/pmem.c > create mode 100644 include/linux/virtio_pmem.h > create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h >(...)> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/pmem.c b/drivers/virtio/pmem.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..cc9de9589d56 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/virtio/pmem.c > @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * virtio_pmem.c: Virtio pmem Driver > + * > + * Discovers persistent memory range information > + * from host and registers the virtual pmem device > + * with libnvdimm core. > + */ > +#include <linux/virtio_pmem.h> > +#include <../../drivers/nvdimm/nd.h> > + > +static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = { > + { VIRTIO_ID_PMEM, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID }, > + { 0 }, > +}; > + > + /* Initialize virt queue */ > +static int init_vq(struct virtio_pmem *vpmem)IMHO, you don't gain much by splitting off this function...> +{ > + struct virtqueue *vq; > + > + /* single vq */ > + vpmem->req_vq = vq = virtio_find_single_vq(vpmem->vdev, > + host_ack, "flush_queue"); > + if (IS_ERR(vq)) > + return PTR_ERR(vq);I'm personally not a fan of chained assignments... I think I'd just drop the 'vq' variable and operate on vpmem->req_vq directly.> + > + spin_lock_init(&vpmem->pmem_lock); > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vpmem->req_list); > + > + return 0; > +}; > + > +static int virtio_pmem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > +{ > + int err = 0; > + struct resource res; > + struct virtio_pmem *vpmem; > + struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus; > + struct nd_region_desc ndr_desc = {}; > + int nid = dev_to_node(&vdev->dev); > + struct nd_region *nd_region; > + > + if (!vdev->config->get) { > + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config disabled\n",Maybe s/config disabled/config access disabled/ ? That seems to be the more common message.> + __func__); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + vdev->priv = vpmem = devm_kzalloc(&vdev->dev, sizeof(*vpmem), > + GFP_KERNEL);Here, the vpmem variable makes sense for convenience, but I'm again not a fan of the chaining :)> + if (!vpmem) { > + err = -ENOMEM; > + goto out_err; > + } > + > + vpmem->vdev = vdev; > + err = init_vq(vpmem); > + if (err) > + goto out_err; > + > + virtio_cread(vpmem->vdev, struct virtio_pmem_config, > + start, &vpmem->start); > + virtio_cread(vpmem->vdev, struct virtio_pmem_config, > + size, &vpmem->size); > + > + res.start = vpmem->start; > + res.end = vpmem->start + vpmem->size-1; > + vpmem->nd_desc.provider_name = "virtio-pmem"; > + vpmem->nd_desc.module = THIS_MODULE; > + > + vpmem->nvdimm_bus = nvdimm_bus = nvdimm_bus_register(&vdev->dev, > + &vpmem->nd_desc);And here :)> + if (!nvdimm_bus) > + goto out_vq; > + > + dev_set_drvdata(&vdev->dev, nvdimm_bus); > + > + ndr_desc.res = &res; > + ndr_desc.numa_node = nid; > + ndr_desc.flush = virtio_pmem_flush; > + set_bit(ND_REGION_PAGEMAP, &ndr_desc.flags); > + set_bit(ND_REGION_ASYNC, &ndr_desc.flags); > + nd_region = nvdimm_pmem_region_create(nvdimm_bus, &ndr_desc); > + nd_region->provider_data = dev_to_virtio > + (nd_region->dev.parent->parent);Isn't it clear that this parent chain will always end up at &vdev->dev? Maybe simply set ->provider_data to vdev directly? (Does it need to grab a reference count of the device, BTW?)> + > + if (!nd_region) > + goto out_nd;Probably better to do this check before you access nd_region's members :)> + > + return 0; > +out_nd: > + err = -ENXIO; > + nvdimm_bus_unregister(nvdimm_bus); > +out_vq: > + vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev); > +out_err: > + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "failed to register virtio pmem memory\n"); > + return err; > +} > + > +static void virtio_pmem_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev) > +{ > + struct virtio_pmem *vpmem = vdev->priv; > + struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus = dev_get_drvdata(&vdev->dev); > + > + nvdimm_bus_unregister(nvdimm_bus);I haven't followed this around the nvdimm code, but is the nd_region you created during probe cleaned up automatically, or would you need to do something here?> + vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev); > + vdev->config->reset(vdev); > + kfree(vpmem);You allocated vpmem via devm_kzalloc; isn't it freed automatically on remove?> +} > + > +static struct virtio_driver virtio_pmem_driver = { > + .driver.name = KBUILD_MODNAME, > + .driver.owner = THIS_MODULE, > + .id_table = id_table, > + .probe = virtio_pmem_probe, > + .remove = virtio_pmem_remove, > +}; > + > +module_virtio_driver(virtio_pmem_driver); > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(virtio, id_table); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Virtio pmem driver"); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");Only looked at this from the general virtio driver angle; seems fine apart from some easy-to-fix issues and some personal style preference things.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 02:24:26PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:38:22 +0530 > Pankaj Gupta <pagupta at redhat.com> wrote: > > > This patch adds virtio-pmem driver for KVM guest. > > > > Guest reads the persistent memory range information from > > Qemu over VIRTIO and registers it on nvdimm_bus. It also > > creates a nd_region object with the persistent memory > > range information so that existing 'nvdimm/pmem' driver > > can reserve this into system memory map. This way > > 'virtio-pmem' driver uses existing functionality of pmem > > driver to register persistent memory compatible for DAX > > capable filesystems. > > > > This also provides function to perform guest flush over > > VIRTIO from 'pmem' driver when userspace performs flush > > on DAX memory range. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta at redhat.com> > > --- > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 10 +++ > > drivers/virtio/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/virtio/pmem.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 60 +++++++++++++++ > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_ids.h | 1 + > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 10 +++ > > 7 files changed, 294 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c > > create mode 100644 drivers/virtio/pmem.c > > create mode 100644 include/linux/virtio_pmem.h > > create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h > > > (...) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/pmem.c b/drivers/virtio/pmem.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..cc9de9589d56 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/pmem.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +/* > > + * virtio_pmem.c: Virtio pmem Driver > > + * > > + * Discovers persistent memory range information > > + * from host and registers the virtual pmem device > > + * with libnvdimm core. > > + */ > > +#include <linux/virtio_pmem.h> > > +#include <../../drivers/nvdimm/nd.h> > > + > > +static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = { > > + { VIRTIO_ID_PMEM, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID }, > > + { 0 }, > > +}; > > + > > + /* Initialize virt queue */ > > +static int init_vq(struct virtio_pmem *vpmem) > > IMHO, you don't gain much by splitting off this function...It make sense to have all the vq-init-related stuff in one function, so here pmem_lock and req_list are used only for the vq. Saying that - maybe it would be better to have the 3 in one struct.> > > +{ > > + struct virtqueue *vq; > > + > > + /* single vq */ > > + vpmem->req_vq = vq = virtio_find_single_vq(vpmem->vdev, > > + host_ack, "flush_queue"); > > + if (IS_ERR(vq)) > > + return PTR_ERR(vq); > > I'm personally not a fan of chained assignments... I think I'd just > drop the 'vq' variable and operate on vpmem->req_vq directly.+1> > > + > > + spin_lock_init(&vpmem->pmem_lock); > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vpmem->req_list); > > + > > + return 0; > > +}; > > + > > +static int virtio_pmem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > +{ > > + int err = 0; > > + struct resource res; > > + struct virtio_pmem *vpmem; > > + struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus; > > + struct nd_region_desc ndr_desc = {}; > > + int nid = dev_to_node(&vdev->dev); > > + struct nd_region *nd_region; > > + > > + if (!vdev->config->get) { > > + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config disabled\n", > > Maybe s/config disabled/config access disabled/ ? That seems to be the > more common message. > > > + __func__); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + vdev->priv = vpmem = devm_kzalloc(&vdev->dev, sizeof(*vpmem), > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > Here, the vpmem variable makes sense for convenience, but I'm again not > a fan of the chaining :)+1> > > + if (!vpmem) { > > + err = -ENOMEM; > > + goto out_err; > > + } > > + > > + vpmem->vdev = vdev; > > + err = init_vq(vpmem); > > + if (err) > > + goto out_err; > > + > > + virtio_cread(vpmem->vdev, struct virtio_pmem_config, > > + start, &vpmem->start); > > + virtio_cread(vpmem->vdev, struct virtio_pmem_config, > > + size, &vpmem->size); > > + > > + res.start = vpmem->start; > > + res.end = vpmem->start + vpmem->size-1; > > + vpmem->nd_desc.provider_name = "virtio-pmem"; > > + vpmem->nd_desc.module = THIS_MODULE; > > + > > + vpmem->nvdimm_bus = nvdimm_bus = nvdimm_bus_register(&vdev->dev, > > + &vpmem->nd_desc); > > And here :) > > > + if (!nvdimm_bus) > > + goto out_vq; > > + > > + dev_set_drvdata(&vdev->dev, nvdimm_bus); > > + > > + ndr_desc.res = &res; > > + ndr_desc.numa_node = nid; > > + ndr_desc.flush = virtio_pmem_flush; > > + set_bit(ND_REGION_PAGEMAP, &ndr_desc.flags); > > + set_bit(ND_REGION_ASYNC, &ndr_desc.flags); > > + nd_region = nvdimm_pmem_region_create(nvdimm_bus, &ndr_desc); > > + nd_region->provider_data = dev_to_virtio > > + (nd_region->dev.parent->parent); > > Isn't it clear that this parent chain will always end up at &vdev->dev? > Maybe simply set ->provider_data to vdev directly? (Does it need to > grab a reference count of the device, BTW?) > > > + > > + if (!nd_region) > > + goto out_nd; > > Probably better to do this check before you access nd_region's > members :) > > > + > > + return 0; > > +out_nd: > > + err = -ENXIO; > > + nvdimm_bus_unregister(nvdimm_bus); > > +out_vq: > > + vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev); > > +out_err: > > + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "failed to register virtio pmem memory\n"); > > + return err; > > +} > > + > > +static void virtio_pmem_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > +{ > > + struct virtio_pmem *vpmem = vdev->priv; > > + struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus = dev_get_drvdata(&vdev->dev); > > + > > + nvdimm_bus_unregister(nvdimm_bus); > > I haven't followed this around the nvdimm code, but is the nd_region > you created during probe cleaned up automatically, or would you need to > do something here? > > > + vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev); > > + vdev->config->reset(vdev); > > + kfree(vpmem); > > You allocated vpmem via devm_kzalloc; isn't it freed automatically on > remove? > > > +} > > + > > +static struct virtio_driver virtio_pmem_driver = { > > + .driver.name = KBUILD_MODNAME, > > + .driver.owner = THIS_MODULE, > > + .id_table = id_table, > > + .probe = virtio_pmem_probe, > > + .remove = virtio_pmem_remove, > > +}; > > + > > +module_virtio_driver(virtio_pmem_driver); > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(virtio, id_table); > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Virtio pmem driver"); > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > > Only looked at this from the general virtio driver angle; seems fine > apart from some easy-to-fix issues and some personal style preference > things.
> > > This patch adds virtio-pmem driver for KVM guest. > > > > Guest reads the persistent memory range information from > > Qemu over VIRTIO and registers it on nvdimm_bus. It also > > creates a nd_region object with the persistent memory > > range information so that existing 'nvdimm/pmem' driver > > can reserve this into system memory map. This way > > 'virtio-pmem' driver uses existing functionality of pmem > > driver to register persistent memory compatible for DAX > > capable filesystems. > > > > This also provides function to perform guest flush over > > VIRTIO from 'pmem' driver when userspace performs flush > > on DAX memory range. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta at redhat.com> > > --- > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 10 +++ > > drivers/virtio/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/virtio/pmem.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 60 +++++++++++++++ > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_ids.h | 1 + > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 10 +++ > > 7 files changed, 294 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c > > create mode 100644 drivers/virtio/pmem.c > > create mode 100644 include/linux/virtio_pmem.h > > create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h > > > (...) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/pmem.c b/drivers/virtio/pmem.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..cc9de9589d56 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/pmem.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +/* > > + * virtio_pmem.c: Virtio pmem Driver > > + * > > + * Discovers persistent memory range information > > + * from host and registers the virtual pmem device > > + * with libnvdimm core. > > + */ > > +#include <linux/virtio_pmem.h> > > +#include <../../drivers/nvdimm/nd.h> > > + > > +static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = { > > + { VIRTIO_ID_PMEM, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID }, > > + { 0 }, > > +}; > > + > > + /* Initialize virt queue */ > > +static int init_vq(struct virtio_pmem *vpmem) > > IMHO, you don't gain much by splitting off this function...o.k. I kept this for better code structure.> > > +{ > > + struct virtqueue *vq; > > + > > + /* single vq */ > > + vpmem->req_vq = vq = virtio_find_single_vq(vpmem->vdev, > > + host_ack, "flush_queue"); > > + if (IS_ERR(vq)) > > + return PTR_ERR(vq); > > I'm personally not a fan of chained assignments... I think I'd just > drop the 'vq' variable and operate on vpmem->req_vq directly.Sure.> > > + > > + spin_lock_init(&vpmem->pmem_lock); > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vpmem->req_list); > > + > > + return 0; > > +}; > > + > > +static int virtio_pmem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > +{ > > + int err = 0; > > + struct resource res; > > + struct virtio_pmem *vpmem; > > + struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus; > > + struct nd_region_desc ndr_desc = {}; > > + int nid = dev_to_node(&vdev->dev); > > + struct nd_region *nd_region; > > + > > + if (!vdev->config->get) { > > + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config disabled\n", > > Maybe s/config disabled/config access disabled/ ? That seems to be the > more common message.This is better.> > > + __func__); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + vdev->priv = vpmem = devm_kzalloc(&vdev->dev, sizeof(*vpmem), > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > Here, the vpmem variable makes sense for convenience, but I'm again not > a fan of the chaining :)Sure will change :)> > > + if (!vpmem) { > > + err = -ENOMEM; > > + goto out_err; > > + } > > + > > + vpmem->vdev = vdev; > > + err = init_vq(vpmem); > > + if (err) > > + goto out_err; > > + > > + virtio_cread(vpmem->vdev, struct virtio_pmem_config, > > + start, &vpmem->start); > > + virtio_cread(vpmem->vdev, struct virtio_pmem_config, > > + size, &vpmem->size); > > + > > + res.start = vpmem->start; > > + res.end = vpmem->start + vpmem->size-1; > > + vpmem->nd_desc.provider_name = "virtio-pmem"; > > + vpmem->nd_desc.module = THIS_MODULE; > > + > > + vpmem->nvdimm_bus = nvdimm_bus = nvdimm_bus_register(&vdev->dev, > > + &vpmem->nd_desc); > > And here :)Sure.> > > + if (!nvdimm_bus) > > + goto out_vq; > > + > > + dev_set_drvdata(&vdev->dev, nvdimm_bus); > > + > > + ndr_desc.res = &res; > > + ndr_desc.numa_node = nid; > > + ndr_desc.flush = virtio_pmem_flush; > > + set_bit(ND_REGION_PAGEMAP, &ndr_desc.flags); > > + set_bit(ND_REGION_ASYNC, &ndr_desc.flags); > > + nd_region = nvdimm_pmem_region_create(nvdimm_bus, &ndr_desc); > > + nd_region->provider_data = dev_to_virtio > > + (nd_region->dev.parent->parent); > > Isn't it clear that this parent chain will always end up at &vdev->dev?Yes, It will resolve to &vdev->dev.> Maybe simply set ->provider_data to vdev directly? (Does it need to > grab a reference count of the device, BTW?)reference is already taken when registering the device with nvdimm_bus.> > > + > > + if (!nd_region) > > + goto out_nd; > > Probably better to do this check before you access nd_region's > members :)ah Sorry! Will correct this.> > > + > > + return 0; > > +out_nd: > > + err = -ENXIO; > > + nvdimm_bus_unregister(nvdimm_bus); > > +out_vq: > > + vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev); > > +out_err: > > + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "failed to register virtio pmem memory\n"); > > + return err; > > +} > > + > > +static void virtio_pmem_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > +{ > > + struct virtio_pmem *vpmem = vdev->priv; > > + struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus = dev_get_drvdata(&vdev->dev); > > + > > + nvdimm_bus_unregister(nvdimm_bus); > > I haven't followed this around the nvdimm code, but is the nd_region > you created during probe cleaned up automatically, or would you need to > do something here?'nvdimm_bus_unregister' does that.> > > + vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev); > > + vdev->config->reset(vdev); > > + kfree(vpmem); > > You allocated vpmem via devm_kzalloc; isn't it freed automatically on > remove?yes. Will remove free(vpmem).> > > +} > > + > > +static struct virtio_driver virtio_pmem_driver = { > > + .driver.name = KBUILD_MODNAME, > > + .driver.owner = THIS_MODULE, > > + .id_table = id_table, > > + .probe = virtio_pmem_probe, > > + .remove = virtio_pmem_remove, > > +}; > > + > > +module_virtio_driver(virtio_pmem_driver); > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(virtio, id_table); > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Virtio pmem driver"); > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > > Only looked at this from the general virtio driver angle; seems fine > apart from some easy-to-fix issues and some personal style preference > things.Thank you for the review. Best regards, Pankaj>
> > > > > This patch adds virtio-pmem driver for KVM guest. > > > > > > Guest reads the persistent memory range information from > > > Qemu over VIRTIO and registers it on nvdimm_bus. It also > > > creates a nd_region object with the persistent memory > > > range information so that existing 'nvdimm/pmem' driver > > > can reserve this into system memory map. This way > > > 'virtio-pmem' driver uses existing functionality of pmem > > > driver to register persistent memory compatible for DAX > > > capable filesystems. > > > > > > This also provides function to perform guest flush over > > > VIRTIO from 'pmem' driver when userspace performs flush > > > on DAX memory range. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta at redhat.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 10 +++ > > > drivers/virtio/Makefile | 1 + > > > drivers/virtio/pmem.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > include/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 60 +++++++++++++++ > > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_ids.h | 1 + > > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 10 +++ > > > 7 files changed, 294 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c > > > create mode 100644 drivers/virtio/pmem.c > > > create mode 100644 include/linux/virtio_pmem.h > > > create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h > > > > > (...) > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/pmem.c b/drivers/virtio/pmem.c > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 000000000000..cc9de9589d56 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/pmem.c > > > @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > +/* > > > + * virtio_pmem.c: Virtio pmem Driver > > > + * > > > + * Discovers persistent memory range information > > > + * from host and registers the virtual pmem device > > > + * with libnvdimm core. > > > + */ > > > +#include <linux/virtio_pmem.h> > > > +#include <../../drivers/nvdimm/nd.h> > > > + > > > +static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = { > > > + { VIRTIO_ID_PMEM, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID }, > > > + { 0 }, > > > +}; > > > + > > > + /* Initialize virt queue */ > > > +static int init_vq(struct virtio_pmem *vpmem) > > > > IMHO, you don't gain much by splitting off this function... > > It make sense to have all the vq-init-related stuff in one function, so > here pmem_lock and req_list are used only for the vq.Yes.> Saying that - maybe it would be better to have the 3 in one struct. > > > > > > +{ > > > + struct virtqueue *vq; > > > + > > > + /* single vq */ > > > + vpmem->req_vq = vq = virtio_find_single_vq(vpmem->vdev, > > > + host_ack, "flush_queue"); > > > + if (IS_ERR(vq)) > > > + return PTR_ERR(vq); > > > > I'm personally not a fan of chained assignments... I think I'd just > > drop the 'vq' variable and operate on vpmem->req_vq directly. > > +1Will drop extra vq.> > > > > > + > > > + spin_lock_init(&vpmem->pmem_lock); > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vpmem->req_list); > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +}; > > > + > > > +static int virtio_pmem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > > +{ > > > + int err = 0; > > > + struct resource res; > > > + struct virtio_pmem *vpmem; > > > + struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus; > > > + struct nd_region_desc ndr_desc = {}; > > > + int nid = dev_to_node(&vdev->dev); > > > + struct nd_region *nd_region; > > > + > > > + if (!vdev->config->get) { > > > + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config disabled\n", > > > > Maybe s/config disabled/config access disabled/ ? That seems to be the > > more common message. > > > > > + __func__); > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + } > > > + > > > + vdev->priv = vpmem = devm_kzalloc(&vdev->dev, sizeof(*vpmem), > > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > > > Here, the vpmem variable makes sense for convenience, but I'm again not > > a fan of the chaining :) > > +1here as well.> > > > > > + if (!vpmem) { > > > + err = -ENOMEM; > > > + goto out_err; > > > + } > > > + > > > + vpmem->vdev = vdev; > > > + err = init_vq(vpmem); > > > + if (err) > > > + goto out_err; > > > + > > > + virtio_cread(vpmem->vdev, struct virtio_pmem_config, > > > + start, &vpmem->start); > > > + virtio_cread(vpmem->vdev, struct virtio_pmem_config, > > > + size, &vpmem->size); > > > + > > > + res.start = vpmem->start; > > > + res.end = vpmem->start + vpmem->size-1; > > > + vpmem->nd_desc.provider_name = "virtio-pmem"; > > > + vpmem->nd_desc.module = THIS_MODULE; > > > + > > > + vpmem->nvdimm_bus = nvdimm_bus = nvdimm_bus_register(&vdev->dev, > > > + &vpmem->nd_desc); > > > > And here :) > > > > > + if (!nvdimm_bus) > > > + goto out_vq; > > > + > > > + dev_set_drvdata(&vdev->dev, nvdimm_bus); > > > + > > > + ndr_desc.res = &res; > > > + ndr_desc.numa_node = nid; > > > + ndr_desc.flush = virtio_pmem_flush; > > > + set_bit(ND_REGION_PAGEMAP, &ndr_desc.flags); > > > + set_bit(ND_REGION_ASYNC, &ndr_desc.flags); > > > + nd_region = nvdimm_pmem_region_create(nvdimm_bus, &ndr_desc); > > > + nd_region->provider_data = dev_to_virtio > > > + (nd_region->dev.parent->parent); > > > > Isn't it clear that this parent chain will always end up at &vdev->dev? > > Maybe simply set ->provider_data to vdev directly? (Does it need to > > grab a reference count of the device, BTW?) > > > > > + > > > + if (!nd_region) > > > + goto out_nd; > > > > Probably better to do this check before you access nd_region's > > members :) > > > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +out_nd: > > > + err = -ENXIO; > > > + nvdimm_bus_unregister(nvdimm_bus); > > > +out_vq: > > > + vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev); > > > +out_err: > > > + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "failed to register virtio pmem memory\n"); > > > + return err; > > > +} > > > + > > > +static void virtio_pmem_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > > +{ > > > + struct virtio_pmem *vpmem = vdev->priv; > > > + struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus = dev_get_drvdata(&vdev->dev); > > > + > > > + nvdimm_bus_unregister(nvdimm_bus); > > > > I haven't followed this around the nvdimm code, but is the nd_region > > you created during probe cleaned up automatically, or would you need to > > do something here? > > > > > + vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev); > > > + vdev->config->reset(vdev); > > > + kfree(vpmem); > > > > You allocated vpmem via devm_kzalloc; isn't it freed automatically on > > remove? > > > > > +} > > > + > > > +static struct virtio_driver virtio_pmem_driver = { > > > + .driver.name = KBUILD_MODNAME, > > > + .driver.owner = THIS_MODULE, > > > + .id_table = id_table, > > > + .probe = virtio_pmem_probe, > > > + .remove = virtio_pmem_remove, > > > +}; > > > + > > > +module_virtio_driver(virtio_pmem_driver); > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(virtio, id_table); > > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Virtio pmem driver"); > > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > > > > Only looked at this from the general virtio driver angle; seems fine > > apart from some easy-to-fix issues and some personal style preference > > things. >Best regards, Pankaj