Cornelia Huck
2018-Sep-20 10:15 UTC
[RFC PATCH 2/2] virtio/s390: fix race in ccw_io_helper()
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 18:56:45 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote:> On 09/19/2018 04:07 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:> > Do you spot any other places where we may need to care about concurrent > > processing (like for the ->config area in the previous patch)? > > > > It is hard to tell, because: > * Synchronization external to the transport could make things work > out just fine. > * virtio_config_ops does not document these requirements if any. > * So it's up to the devices to use the stuff without shooting > themselves in the foot. > * virtio-pci does not seem to do more to avoid such problems that > we do. > > Back then when learning vritio-ccw I did ask myself such questions > and based on vrito-pci and I was like looks similar, should be > good enough.Yep, I agree. If there's nothing obvious, I think we should just leave it as it is now.
Maybe Matching Threads
- [PATCH 2/2] virtio/s390: fix race in ccw_io_helper()
- [RFC PATCH 2/2] virtio/s390: fix race in ccw_io_helper()
- [RFC PATCH 2/2] virtio/s390: fix race in ccw_io_helper()
- [PATCH v2 6/8] virtio/s390: add indirection to indicators access
- [PATCH v2 6/8] virtio/s390: add indirection to indicators access