Jason Baron
2018-Jan-04 18:12 UTC
[PATCH net-next v3 1/3] virtio_net: propagate linkspeed/duplex settings from the hypervisor
On 01/04/2018 12:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 12:16:44AM -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> The ability to set speed and duplex for virtio_net is useful in various >> scenarios as described here: >> >> 16032be virtio_net: add ethtool support for set and get of settings >> >> However, it would be nice to be able to set this from the hypervisor, >> such that virtio_net doesn't require custom guest ethtool commands. >> >> Introduce a new feature flag, VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX, which allows >> the hypervisor to export a linkspeed and duplex setting. The user can >> subsequently overwrite it later if desired via: 'ethtool -s'. >> >> Note that VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX is defined as bit 63, the intention >> is that device feature bits are to grow down from bit 63, since the >> transports are starting from bit 24 and growing up. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron at akamai.com> >> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> >> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> >> Cc: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org >> --- >> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- >> include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 13 +++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c >> index 6fb7b65..0b2d314 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c >> @@ -2146,6 +2146,22 @@ static void virtnet_config_changed_work(struct work_struct *work) >> >> vi->status = v; >> >> + if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX)) { > > BTW we can avoid this read for when link goes down. > Not a big deal but still.So you are saying that we can just set vi->speed and vi->duplex to 'unknown' when the link goes down and not check for the presence of VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX? If so, that could over-write what the user may have configured in the guest via 'ethtool -s' when the link goes down, so that would be a change in behavior, but perhaps that is ok? I think I would prefer to have the link down event still check for VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX before changing speed/duplex. That way we still have 2 modes for updating the fields: 1) completely guest controlled. Same as we have now and host does not change any values and does not set VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX flag (hence don't remove above check). 2) if speed or duplex or speed is set in the qemu command line, then set the VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX and have host control the settings of speed/duplex (with ability of guest to over-write if it wanted to).> >> + u32 speed; >> + u8 duplex; >> + >> + speed = virtio_cread32(vi->vdev, >> + offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, >> + speed)); >> + if (ethtool_validate_speed(speed)) >> + vi->speed = speed; >> + duplex = virtio_cread8(vi->vdev, >> + offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, >> + duplex)); >> + if (ethtool_validate_duplex(duplex)) >> + vi->duplex = duplex; >> + } >> + >> if (vi->status & VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP) { >> netif_carrier_on(vi->dev); >> netif_tx_wake_all_queues(vi->dev); > > OK so this handles the case when VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS is set, > but when it's clear we need to call this from virtnet_probe. > > I propose moving this chunk to a function and calling from two places. >good point. will update. Thanks, -Jason> >> @@ -2796,7 +2812,8 @@ static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = { >> VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VLAN, \ >> VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ, \ >> VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR, \ >> - VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS >> + VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS, \ >> + VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX >> >> static unsigned int features[] = { >> VIRTNET_FEATURES, >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h >> index fc353b5..5de6ed3 100644 >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h >> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ >> * Steering */ >> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR 23 /* Set MAC address */ >> >> +#define VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX 63 /* Device set linkspeed and duplex */ >> + >> #ifndef VIRTIO_NET_NO_LEGACY >> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_GSO 6 /* Host handles pkts w/ any GSO type */ >> #endif /* VIRTIO_NET_NO_LEGACY */ >> @@ -76,6 +78,17 @@ struct virtio_net_config { >> __u16 max_virtqueue_pairs; >> /* Default maximum transmit unit advice */ >> __u16 mtu; >> + /* >> + * speed, in units of 1Mb. All values 0 to INT_MAX are legal. >> + * Any other value stands for unknown. >> + */ >> + __u32 speed; >> + /* >> + * 0x00 - half duplex >> + * 0x01 - full duplex >> + * Any other value stands for unknown. >> + */ >> + __u8 duplex; >> } __attribute__((packed)); >> >> /* >> -- >> 2.6.1
Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-Jan-04 18:22 UTC
[PATCH net-next v3 1/3] virtio_net: propagate linkspeed/duplex settings from the hypervisor
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 01:12:30PM -0500, Jason Baron wrote:> > > On 01/04/2018 12:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 12:16:44AM -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > >> The ability to set speed and duplex for virtio_net is useful in various > >> scenarios as described here: > >> > >> 16032be virtio_net: add ethtool support for set and get of settings > >> > >> However, it would be nice to be able to set this from the hypervisor, > >> such that virtio_net doesn't require custom guest ethtool commands. > >> > >> Introduce a new feature flag, VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX, which allows > >> the hypervisor to export a linkspeed and duplex setting. The user can > >> subsequently overwrite it later if desired via: 'ethtool -s'. > >> > >> Note that VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX is defined as bit 63, the intention > >> is that device feature bits are to grow down from bit 63, since the > >> transports are starting from bit 24 and growing up. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron at akamai.com> > >> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> > >> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > >> Cc: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org > >> --- > >> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- > >> include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 13 +++++++++++++ > >> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > >> index 6fb7b65..0b2d314 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > >> @@ -2146,6 +2146,22 @@ static void virtnet_config_changed_work(struct work_struct *work) > >> > >> vi->status = v; > >> > >> + if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX)) { > > > > BTW we can avoid this read for when link goes down. > > Not a big deal but still. > > So you are saying that we can just set vi->speed and vi->duplex to > 'unknown' when the link goes down and not check for the presence of > VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX? > > If so, that could over-write what the user may have configured in the > guest via 'ethtool -s' when the link goes down, so that would be a > change in behavior, but perhaps that is ok?No - what I am saying is that your patch overwrites the values set by user when link goes down. I suggest limiting this call to when if (vi->status & VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP) and then the values are overwritten when link goes up which seems closer to what a user might expect.> > I think I would prefer to have the link down event still check for > VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX before changing speed/duplex. That way we > still have 2 modes for updating the fields: > > 1) completely guest controlled. Same as we have now and host does not > change any values and does not set VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX flag (hence > don't remove above check). > > 2) if speed or duplex or speed is set in the qemu command line, then set > the VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX and have host control the settings of > speed/duplex (with ability of guest to over-write if it wanted to). > > > > > >> + u32 speed; > >> + u8 duplex; > >> + > >> + speed = virtio_cread32(vi->vdev, > >> + offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, > >> + speed)); > >> + if (ethtool_validate_speed(speed)) > >> + vi->speed = speed; > >> + duplex = virtio_cread8(vi->vdev, > >> + offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, > >> + duplex)); > >> + if (ethtool_validate_duplex(duplex)) > >> + vi->duplex = duplex; > >> + } > >> + > >> if (vi->status & VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP) { > >> netif_carrier_on(vi->dev); > >> netif_tx_wake_all_queues(vi->dev); > > > > OK so this handles the case when VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS is set, > > but when it's clear we need to call this from virtnet_probe. > > > > I propose moving this chunk to a function and calling from two places. > > > > good point. will update. > > Thanks, > > -Jason > > > > >> @@ -2796,7 +2812,8 @@ static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = { > >> VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VLAN, \ > >> VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ, \ > >> VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR, \ > >> - VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS > >> + VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS, \ > >> + VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX > >> > >> static unsigned int features[] = { > >> VIRTNET_FEATURES, > >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h > >> index fc353b5..5de6ed3 100644 > >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h > >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h > >> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ > >> * Steering */ > >> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR 23 /* Set MAC address */ > >> > >> +#define VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX 63 /* Device set linkspeed and duplex */ > >> + > >> #ifndef VIRTIO_NET_NO_LEGACY > >> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_GSO 6 /* Host handles pkts w/ any GSO type */ > >> #endif /* VIRTIO_NET_NO_LEGACY */ > >> @@ -76,6 +78,17 @@ struct virtio_net_config { > >> __u16 max_virtqueue_pairs; > >> /* Default maximum transmit unit advice */ > >> __u16 mtu; > >> + /* > >> + * speed, in units of 1Mb. All values 0 to INT_MAX are legal. > >> + * Any other value stands for unknown. > >> + */ > >> + __u32 speed; > >> + /* > >> + * 0x00 - half duplex > >> + * 0x01 - full duplex > >> + * Any other value stands for unknown. > >> + */ > >> + __u8 duplex; > >> } __attribute__((packed)); > >> > >> /* > >> -- > >> 2.6.1
Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-Jan-04 18:23 UTC
[PATCH net-next v3 1/3] virtio_net: propagate linkspeed/duplex settings from the hypervisor
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 08:22:08PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 01:12:30PM -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > > > > > > On 01/04/2018 12:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 12:16:44AM -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > > >> The ability to set speed and duplex for virtio_net is useful in various > > >> scenarios as described here: > > >> > > >> 16032be virtio_net: add ethtool support for set and get of settings > > >> > > >> However, it would be nice to be able to set this from the hypervisor, > > >> such that virtio_net doesn't require custom guest ethtool commands. > > >> > > >> Introduce a new feature flag, VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX, which allows > > >> the hypervisor to export a linkspeed and duplex setting. The user can > > >> subsequently overwrite it later if desired via: 'ethtool -s'. > > >> > > >> Note that VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX is defined as bit 63, the intention > > >> is that device feature bits are to grow down from bit 63, since the > > >> transports are starting from bit 24 and growing up. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron at akamai.com> > > >> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> > > >> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > > >> Cc: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org > > >> --- > > >> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- > > >> include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 13 +++++++++++++ > > >> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > >> index 6fb7b65..0b2d314 100644 > > >> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > >> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > >> @@ -2146,6 +2146,22 @@ static void virtnet_config_changed_work(struct work_struct *work) > > >> > > >> vi->status = v; > > >> > > >> + if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX)) { > > > > > > BTW we can avoid this read for when link goes down. > > > Not a big deal but still. > > > > So you are saying that we can just set vi->speed and vi->duplex to > > 'unknown' when the link goes down and not check for the presence of > > VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX? > > > > If so, that could over-write what the user may have configured in the > > guest via 'ethtool -s' when the link goes down, so that would be a > > change in behavior, but perhaps that is ok? > > No - what I am saying is that your patch overwrites the values > set by user when link goes down. > > I suggest limiting this call to when > > if (vi->status & VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP) > > and then the values are overwritten when link goes up > which seems closer to what a user might expect. > > > > > I think I would prefer to have the link down event still check for > > VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX before changing speed/duplex. That way we > > still have 2 modes for updating the fields: > > > > 1) completely guest controlled. Same as we have now and host does not > > change any values and does not set VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX flag (hence > > don't remove above check). > > > > 2) if speed or duplex or speed is set in the qemu command line, then set > > the VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX and have host control the settings of > > speed/duplex (with ability of guest to over-write if it wanted to).I agree - I don't see a reason to touch the speed/duplex values when VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX has not been negotiated.> > > > > > > > > >> + u32 speed; > > >> + u8 duplex; > > >> + > > >> + speed = virtio_cread32(vi->vdev, > > >> + offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, > > >> + speed)); > > >> + if (ethtool_validate_speed(speed)) > > >> + vi->speed = speed; > > >> + duplex = virtio_cread8(vi->vdev, > > >> + offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, > > >> + duplex)); > > >> + if (ethtool_validate_duplex(duplex)) > > >> + vi->duplex = duplex; > > >> + } > > >> + > > >> if (vi->status & VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP) { > > >> netif_carrier_on(vi->dev); > > >> netif_tx_wake_all_queues(vi->dev); > > > > > > OK so this handles the case when VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS is set, > > > but when it's clear we need to call this from virtnet_probe. > > > > > > I propose moving this chunk to a function and calling from two places. > > > > > > > good point. will update. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Jason > > > > > > > >> @@ -2796,7 +2812,8 @@ static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = { > > >> VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VLAN, \ > > >> VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ, \ > > >> VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR, \ > > >> - VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS > > >> + VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS, \ > > >> + VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX > > >> > > >> static unsigned int features[] = { > > >> VIRTNET_FEATURES, > > >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h > > >> index fc353b5..5de6ed3 100644 > > >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h > > >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h > > >> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ > > >> * Steering */ > > >> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR 23 /* Set MAC address */ > > >> > > >> +#define VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX 63 /* Device set linkspeed and duplex */ > > >> + > > >> #ifndef VIRTIO_NET_NO_LEGACY > > >> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_GSO 6 /* Host handles pkts w/ any GSO type */ > > >> #endif /* VIRTIO_NET_NO_LEGACY */ > > >> @@ -76,6 +78,17 @@ struct virtio_net_config { > > >> __u16 max_virtqueue_pairs; > > >> /* Default maximum transmit unit advice */ > > >> __u16 mtu; > > >> + /* > > >> + * speed, in units of 1Mb. All values 0 to INT_MAX are legal. > > >> + * Any other value stands for unknown. > > >> + */ > > >> + __u32 speed; > > >> + /* > > >> + * 0x00 - half duplex > > >> + * 0x01 - full duplex > > >> + * Any other value stands for unknown. > > >> + */ > > >> + __u8 duplex; > > >> } __attribute__((packed)); > > >> > > >> /* > > >> -- > > >> 2.6.1
Jason Baron
2018-Jan-04 19:34 UTC
[PATCH net-next v3 1/3] virtio_net: propagate linkspeed/duplex settings from the hypervisor
On 01/04/2018 01:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 01:12:30PM -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> >> >> On 01/04/2018 12:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 12:16:44AM -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>> The ability to set speed and duplex for virtio_net is useful in various >>>> scenarios as described here: >>>> >>>> 16032be virtio_net: add ethtool support for set and get of settings >>>> >>>> However, it would be nice to be able to set this from the hypervisor, >>>> such that virtio_net doesn't require custom guest ethtool commands. >>>> >>>> Introduce a new feature flag, VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX, which allows >>>> the hypervisor to export a linkspeed and duplex setting. The user can >>>> subsequently overwrite it later if desired via: 'ethtool -s'. >>>> >>>> Note that VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX is defined as bit 63, the intention >>>> is that device feature bits are to grow down from bit 63, since the >>>> transports are starting from bit 24 and growing up. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron at akamai.com> >>>> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> >>>> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> >>>> Cc: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org >>>> --- >>>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- >>>> include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 13 +++++++++++++ >>>> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c >>>> index 6fb7b65..0b2d314 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c >>>> @@ -2146,6 +2146,22 @@ static void virtnet_config_changed_work(struct work_struct *work) >>>> >>>> vi->status = v; >>>> >>>> + if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX)) { >>> >>> BTW we can avoid this read for when link goes down. >>> Not a big deal but still. >> >> So you are saying that we can just set vi->speed and vi->duplex to >> 'unknown' when the link goes down and not check for the presence of >> VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX? >> >> If so, that could over-write what the user may have configured in the >> guest via 'ethtool -s' when the link goes down, so that would be a >> change in behavior, but perhaps that is ok? > > No - what I am saying is that your patch overwrites the values > set by user when link goes down. > > I suggest limiting this call to when > > if (vi->status & VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP) > > and then the values are overwritten when link goes up > which seems closer to what a user might expect.ok, will update this for v4. Thanks, -Jason> >> >> I think I would prefer to have the link down event still check for >> VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX before changing speed/duplex. That way we >> still have 2 modes for updating the fields: >> >> 1) completely guest controlled. Same as we have now and host does not >> change any values and does not set VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX flag (hence >> don't remove above check). >> >> 2) if speed or duplex or speed is set in the qemu command line, then set >> the VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX and have host control the settings of >> speed/duplex (with ability of guest to over-write if it wanted to). >> >> >>> >>>> + u32 speed; >>>> + u8 duplex; >>>> + >>>> + speed = virtio_cread32(vi->vdev, >>>> + offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, >>>> + speed)); >>>> + if (ethtool_validate_speed(speed)) >>>> + vi->speed = speed; >>>> + duplex = virtio_cread8(vi->vdev, >>>> + offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, >>>> + duplex)); >>>> + if (ethtool_validate_duplex(duplex)) >>>> + vi->duplex = duplex; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> if (vi->status & VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP) { >>>> netif_carrier_on(vi->dev); >>>> netif_tx_wake_all_queues(vi->dev); >>> >>> OK so this handles the case when VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS is set, >>> but when it's clear we need to call this from virtnet_probe. >>> >>> I propose moving this chunk to a function and calling from two places. >>> >> >> good point. will update. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Jason >> >>> >>>> @@ -2796,7 +2812,8 @@ static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = { >>>> VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VLAN, \ >>>> VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ, \ >>>> VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR, \ >>>> - VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS >>>> + VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS, \ >>>> + VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX >>>> >>>> static unsigned int features[] = { >>>> VIRTNET_FEATURES, >>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h >>>> index fc353b5..5de6ed3 100644 >>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h >>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h >>>> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ >>>> * Steering */ >>>> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR 23 /* Set MAC address */ >>>> >>>> +#define VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX 63 /* Device set linkspeed and duplex */ >>>> + >>>> #ifndef VIRTIO_NET_NO_LEGACY >>>> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_GSO 6 /* Host handles pkts w/ any GSO type */ >>>> #endif /* VIRTIO_NET_NO_LEGACY */ >>>> @@ -76,6 +78,17 @@ struct virtio_net_config { >>>> __u16 max_virtqueue_pairs; >>>> /* Default maximum transmit unit advice */ >>>> __u16 mtu; >>>> + /* >>>> + * speed, in units of 1Mb. All values 0 to INT_MAX are legal. >>>> + * Any other value stands for unknown. >>>> + */ >>>> + __u32 speed; >>>> + /* >>>> + * 0x00 - half duplex >>>> + * 0x01 - full duplex >>>> + * Any other value stands for unknown. >>>> + */ >>>> + __u8 duplex; >>>> } __attribute__((packed)); >>>> >>>> /* >>>> -- >>>> 2.6.1
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] virtio_net: propagate linkspeed/duplex settings from the hypervisor
- [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] virtio_net: propagate linkspeed/duplex settings from the hypervisor
- [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] virtio_net: propagate linkspeed/duplex settings from the hypervisor
- [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] virtio_net: propagate linkspeed/duplex settings from the hypervisor
- [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] virtio_net: propagate linkspeed/duplex settings from the hypervisor