David Gibson
2015-Jan-22 02:06 UTC
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v6 07/20] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:25:09PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:> For virtio-1 devices, we allow a more complex queue layout that doesn't > require descriptor table and rings on a physically-contigous memory area: > add virtio_queue_set_rings() to allow transports to set this up. > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> > --- > hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c | 3 +++ > hw/virtio/virtio.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 3 +++ > 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c > index 43b7e02..0c9b63b 100644 > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c > @@ -244,8 +244,11 @@ static void virtio_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value, > case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUENUM: > DPRINTF("mmio_queue write %d max %d\n", (int)value, VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE); > virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, value); > + /* Note: only call this function for legacy devices */It's not clear to me if this is an assertion that this *does* only call the function for legacy devices or a fixme, that it *should* only call the function for legacy devices.> + virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel); > break; > case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUEALIGN: > + /* Note: this is only valid for legacy devices */ > virtio_queue_set_align(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, value); > break; > case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUEPFN: > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c > index 8f69ffa..57190ba 100644 > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c > @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ typedef struct VRing > struct VirtQueue > { > VRing vring; > - hwaddr pa; > uint16_t last_avail_idx; > /* Last used index value we have signalled on */ > uint16_t signalled_used; > @@ -92,15 +91,18 @@ struct VirtQueue > }; > > /* virt queue functions */ > -static void virtqueue_init(VirtQueue *vq) > +void virtio_queue_update_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)Perhaps something in the name to emphasise that this is only for <v1.0 devices?> { > - hwaddr pa = vq->pa; > + VRing *vring = &vdev->vq[n].vring; > > - vq->vring.desc = pa; > - vq->vring.avail = pa + vq->vring.num * sizeof(VRingDesc); > - vq->vring.used = vring_align(vq->vring.avail + > - offsetof(VRingAvail, ring[vq->vring.num]), > - vq->vring.align); > + if (!vring->desc) { > + /* not yet setup -> nothing to do */ > + return; > + } > + vring->avail = vring->desc + vring->num * sizeof(VRingDesc); > + vring->used = vring_align(vring->avail + > + offsetof(VRingAvail, ring[vring->num]), > + vring->align);Would it make sense to implement this in terms of virtio_queue_set_rings()?> } > > static inline uint64_t vring_desc_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, hwaddr desc_pa, > @@ -605,7 +607,6 @@ void virtio_reset(void *opaque) > vdev->vq[i].vring.avail = 0; > vdev->vq[i].vring.used = 0; > vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx = 0; > - vdev->vq[i].pa = 0; > vdev->vq[i].vector = VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR; > vdev->vq[i].signalled_used = 0; > vdev->vq[i].signalled_used_valid = false; > @@ -708,13 +709,21 @@ void virtio_config_writel(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint32_t addr, uint32_t data) > > void virtio_queue_set_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr addr) > { > - vdev->vq[n].pa = addr; > - virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]); > + vdev->vq[n].vring.desc = addr; > + virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, n); > } > > hwaddr virtio_queue_get_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n) > { > - return vdev->vq[n].pa; > + return vdev->vq[n].vring.desc; > +} > + > +void virtio_queue_set_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr desc, > + hwaddr avail, hwaddr used) > +{ > + vdev->vq[n].vring.desc = desc; > + vdev->vq[n].vring.avail = avail; > + vdev->vq[n].vring.used = used; > } > > void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num) > @@ -728,7 +737,6 @@ void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num) > return; > } > vdev->vq[n].vring.num = num; > - virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]); > } > > int virtio_queue_get_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n) > @@ -748,6 +756,11 @@ void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int align) > BusState *qbus = qdev_get_parent_bus(DEVICE(vdev)); > VirtioBusClass *k = VIRTIO_BUS_GET_CLASS(qbus); > > + /* virtio-1 compliant devices cannot change the aligment */ > + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) { > + error_report("tried to modify queue alignment for virtio-1 device"); > + return; > + } > /* Check that the transport told us it was going to do this > * (so a buggy transport will immediately assert rather than > * silently failing to migrate this state) > @@ -755,7 +768,7 @@ void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int align) > assert(k->has_variable_vring_alignment); > > vdev->vq[n].vring.align = align; > - virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]); > + virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, n); > } > > void virtio_queue_notify_vq(VirtQueue *vq) > @@ -949,7 +962,8 @@ void virtio_save(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f) > if (k->has_variable_vring_alignment) { > qemu_put_be32(f, vdev->vq[i].vring.align); > } > - qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].pa); > + /* XXX virtio-1 devices */ > + qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].vring.desc); > qemu_put_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx); > if (k->save_queue) { > k->save_queue(qbus->parent, i, f); > @@ -1044,13 +1058,14 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int version_id) > if (k->has_variable_vring_alignment) { > vdev->vq[i].vring.align = qemu_get_be32(f); > } > - vdev->vq[i].pa = qemu_get_be64(f); > + vdev->vq[i].vring.desc = qemu_get_be64(f); > qemu_get_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx); > vdev->vq[i].signalled_used_valid = false; > vdev->vq[i].notification = true; > > - if (vdev->vq[i].pa) { > - virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[i]); > + if (vdev->vq[i].vring.desc) { > + /* XXX virtio-1 devices */ > + virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, i); > } else if (vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx) { > error_report("VQ %d address 0x0 " > "inconsistent with Host index 0x%x", > @@ -1084,7 +1099,7 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int version_id) > } > > for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { > - if (vdev->vq[i].pa) { > + if (vdev->vq[i].vring.desc) { > uint16_t nheads; > nheads = vring_avail_idx(&vdev->vq[i]) - vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx; > /* Check it isn't doing strange things with descriptor numbers. */ > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > index 68c40db..b63ced3 100644 > --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > @@ -224,6 +224,9 @@ void virtio_queue_set_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr addr); > hwaddr virtio_queue_get_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n); > void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num); > int virtio_queue_get_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n); > +void virtio_queue_set_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr desc, > + hwaddr avail, hwaddr used); > +void virtio_queue_update_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n); > void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int align); > void virtio_queue_notify(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n); > uint16_t virtio_queue_vector(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);-- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20150122/231dcc8e/attachment-0001.sig>
Cornelia Huck
2015-Jan-28 16:07 UTC
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v6 07/20] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:06:09 +1100 David Gibson <david at gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:25:09PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > For virtio-1 devices, we allow a more complex queue layout that doesn't > > require descriptor table and rings on a physically-contigous memory area: > > add virtio_queue_set_rings() to allow transports to set this up. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> > > --- > > hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c | 3 +++ > > hw/virtio/virtio.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 3 +++ > > 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c > > index 43b7e02..0c9b63b 100644 > > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c > > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c > > @@ -244,8 +244,11 @@ static void virtio_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value, > > case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUENUM: > > DPRINTF("mmio_queue write %d max %d\n", (int)value, VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE); > > virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, value); > > + /* Note: only call this function for legacy devices */ > > It's not clear to me if this is an assertion that this *does* only > call the function for legacy devices or a fixme, that it *should* only > call the function for legacy devices.It's more like a note to whoever takes the virtio-mmio legacy device code and writes a virtio-1 virtio-mmio device. Does /* Note: this function must only be called for legacy devices */ make that intention clearer?> > > + virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel); > > break; > > case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUEALIGN: > > + /* Note: this is only valid for legacy devices */ > > virtio_queue_set_align(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, value); > > break; > > case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUEPFN:(...)> > /* virt queue functions */ > > -static void virtqueue_init(VirtQueue *vq) > > +void virtio_queue_update_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n) > > Perhaps something in the name to emphasise that this is only for <v1.0 > devices?virtio_queue_legacy_update_rings()? Maybe a bit long...> > > { > > - hwaddr pa = vq->pa; > > + VRing *vring = &vdev->vq[n].vring; > > > > - vq->vring.desc = pa; > > - vq->vring.avail = pa + vq->vring.num * sizeof(VRingDesc); > > - vq->vring.used = vring_align(vq->vring.avail + > > - offsetof(VRingAvail, ring[vq->vring.num]), > > - vq->vring.align); > > + if (!vring->desc) { > > + /* not yet setup -> nothing to do */ > > + return; > > + } > > + vring->avail = vring->desc + vring->num * sizeof(VRingDesc); > > + vring->used = vring_align(vring->avail + > > + offsetof(VRingAvail, ring[vring->num]), > > + vring->align); > > Would it make sense to implement this in terms of > virtio_queue_set_rings()?Perhaps a bit confusing, since that would re-write desc.> > > }
David Gibson
2015-Jan-29 00:14 UTC
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v6 07/20] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 05:07:01PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:06:09 +1100 > David Gibson <david at gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:25:09PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > For virtio-1 devices, we allow a more complex queue layout that doesn't > > > require descriptor table and rings on a physically-contigous memory area: > > > add virtio_queue_set_rings() to allow transports to set this up. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> > > > --- > > > hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c | 3 +++ > > > hw/virtio/virtio.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > > include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 3 +++ > > > 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c > > > index 43b7e02..0c9b63b 100644 > > > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c > > > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c > > > @@ -244,8 +244,11 @@ static void virtio_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value, > > > case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUENUM: > > > DPRINTF("mmio_queue write %d max %d\n", (int)value, VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE); > > > virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, value); > > > + /* Note: only call this function for legacy devices */ > > > > It's not clear to me if this is an assertion that this *does* only > > call the function for legacy devices or a fixme, that it *should* only > > call the function for legacy devices. > > It's more like a note to whoever takes the virtio-mmio legacy device > code and writes a virtio-1 virtio-mmio device. > > Does > /* Note: this function must only be called for legacy devices */ > make that intention clearer?Yes, I think that's better.> > > > > > + virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel); > > > break; > > > case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUEALIGN: > > > + /* Note: this is only valid for legacy devices */ > > > virtio_queue_set_align(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, value); > > > break; > > > case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUEPFN: > > (...) > > > > /* virt queue functions */ > > > -static void virtqueue_init(VirtQueue *vq) > > > +void virtio_queue_update_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n) > > > > Perhaps something in the name to emphasise that this is only for <v1.0 > > devices? > > virtio_queue_legacy_update_rings()? Maybe a bit long...There aren't many callers, so I think long is ok in this case. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20150129/be072140/attachment.sig>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v6 07/20] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v6 07/20] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v6 07/20] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout
- [PATCH RFC v6 07/20] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout
- [PATCH RFC v6 07/20] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout