Peter Zijlstra
2014-May-08 19:04 UTC
[PATCH v10 08/19] qspinlock: Make a new qnode structure to support virtualization
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:01:36AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:> /* > + * To have additional features for better virtualization support, it is > + * necessary to store additional data in the queue node structure. So > + * a new queue node structure will have to be defined and used here. > + */ > +struct qnode { > + struct mcs_spinlock mcs; > +};You can ditch this entire patch; its pointless, just add a new DEFINE_PER_CPU for the para-virt muck.
Waiman Long
2014-May-10 01:08 UTC
[PATCH v10 08/19] qspinlock: Make a new qnode structure to support virtualization
On 05/08/2014 03:04 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:01:36AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> /* >> + * To have additional features for better virtualization support, it is >> + * necessary to store additional data in the queue node structure. So >> + * a new queue node structure will have to be defined and used here. >> + */ >> +struct qnode { >> + struct mcs_spinlock mcs; >> +}; > You can ditch this entire patch; its pointless, just add a new > DEFINE_PER_CPU for the para-virt muck.Yes, I can certainly merge it to the next one in the series. I break it out to make each individual patch smaller, more single-purpose and easier to review. -Longman
Peter Zijlstra
2014-May-10 14:14 UTC
[PATCH v10 08/19] qspinlock: Make a new qnode structure to support virtualization
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 09:08:56PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:> On 05/08/2014 03:04 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:01:36AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > >> /* > >>+ * To have additional features for better virtualization support, it is > >>+ * necessary to store additional data in the queue node structure. So > >>+ * a new queue node structure will have to be defined and used here. > >>+ */ > >>+struct qnode { > >>+ struct mcs_spinlock mcs; > >>+}; > >You can ditch this entire patch; its pointless, just add a new > >DEFINE_PER_CPU for the para-virt muck. > > Yes, I can certainly merge it to the next one in the series. I break it out > to make each individual patch smaller, more single-purpose and easier to > review.No, don't merge it, _drop_ it. Wrapping things in a struct generates a ton of pointless change. Put the new data in a new DEFINE_PER_CPU and leave the existing code as is. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20140510/ca7aa54f/attachment.sig>
Reasonably Related Threads
- [PATCH v10 08/19] qspinlock: Make a new qnode structure to support virtualization
- [PATCH v10 08/19] qspinlock: Make a new qnode structure to support virtualization
- [PATCH v10 08/19] qspinlock: Make a new qnode structure to support virtualization
- [PATCH v10 08/19] qspinlock: Make a new qnode structure to support virtualization
- [PATCH v10 00/19] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support