Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-Jul-23 11:57 UTC
[PATCHv2 1/2] virtio: fix double free_irq on device removal
msix_user_vectors counted both per-vq and shared/config vectors.
This causes BUG_ON when device is removed, as
free_vectors tries to free per-vq vectors.
Count per-vq vectors separately so they are only freed by del_vq.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
index 193c8f0..a40e4f7 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct virtio_pci_device
char (*msix_names)[256];
/* Number of available vectors */
unsigned msix_vectors;
- /* Vectors allocated */
+ /* Vectors allocated, excluding per-vq vectors if any */
unsigned msix_used_vectors;
};
@@ -364,13 +364,15 @@ error_entries:
static struct virtqueue *vp_find_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned index,
void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *vq),
- const char *name)
+ const char *name,
+ u16 vector,
+ u16 per_vq_vector)
{
struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev);
struct virtio_pci_vq_info *info;
struct virtqueue *vq;
unsigned long flags, size;
- u16 num, vector;
+ u16 num;
int err;
/* Select the queue we're interested in */
@@ -389,7 +391,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vp_find_vq(struct virtio_device
*vdev, unsigned index,
info->queue_index = index;
info->num = num;
- info->vector = VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR;
+ info->vector = per_vq_vector;
size = PAGE_ALIGN(vring_size(num, VIRTIO_PCI_VRING_ALIGN));
info->queue = alloc_pages_exact(size, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
@@ -414,8 +416,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vp_find_vq(struct virtio_device
*vdev, unsigned index,
info->vq = vq;
/* allocate per-vq vector if available and necessary */
- if (callback && vp_dev->msix_used_vectors <
vp_dev->msix_vectors) {
- vector = vp_dev->msix_used_vectors;
+ if (info->vector != VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
snprintf(vp_dev->msix_names[vector], sizeof *vp_dev->msix_names,
"%s-%s", dev_name(&vp_dev->vdev.dev), name);
err = request_irq(vp_dev->msix_entries[vector].vector,
@@ -423,10 +424,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vp_find_vq(struct virtio_device
*vdev, unsigned index,
vp_dev->msix_names[vector], vq);
if (err)
goto out_request_irq;
- info->vector = vector;
- ++vp_dev->msix_used_vectors;
- } else
- vector = VP_MSIX_VQ_VECTOR;
+ }
if (callback && vp_dev->msix_enabled) {
iowrite16(vector, vp_dev->ioaddr + VIRTIO_MSI_QUEUE_VECTOR);
@@ -444,10 +442,8 @@ static struct virtqueue *vp_find_vq(struct virtio_device
*vdev, unsigned index,
return vq;
out_assign:
- if (info->vector != VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
+ if (info->vector != VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR)
free_irq(vp_dev->msix_entries[info->vector].vector, vq);
- --vp_dev->msix_used_vectors;
- }
out_request_irq:
vring_del_virtqueue(vq);
out_activate_queue:
@@ -503,8 +499,10 @@ static int vp_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned
nvqs,
vq_callback_t *callbacks[],
const char *names[])
{
+ struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev);
+ u16 vector, per_vq_vector;
int vectors = 0;
- int i, err;
+ int i, err, allocated_vectors;
/* How many vectors would we like? */
for (i = 0; i < nvqs; ++i)
@@ -515,8 +513,18 @@ static int vp_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned
nvqs,
if (err)
goto error_request;
+ allocated_vectors = vp_dev->msix_used_vectors;
for (i = 0; i < nvqs; ++i) {
- vqs[i] = vp_find_vq(vdev, i, callbacks[i], names[i]);
+ if (!callbacks[i])
+ vector = per_vq_vector = VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR;
+ else if (vp_dev->msix_used_vectors < vp_dev->msix_vectors)
+ per_vq_vector = vector = allocated_vectors++;
+ else {
+ vector = VP_MSIX_VQ_VECTOR;
+ per_vq_vector = VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR;
+ }
+ vqs[i] = vp_find_vq(vdev, i, callbacks[i], names[i],
+ vector, per_vq_vector);
if (IS_ERR(vqs[i]))
goto error_find;
}
--
1.6.2.5
Rusty Russell
2009-Jul-24 12:24 UTC
[PATCHv2 1/2] virtio: fix double free_irq on device removal
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:27:31 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> msix_user_vectors counted both per-vq and shared/config vectors. > This causes BUG_ON when device is removed, as > free_vectors tries to free per-vq vectors.OK, I looked at this patch, then looked at this code (after it was applied). I'm still very confused. Looking at the call site for vp_find_vq: for (i = 0; i < nvqs; ++i) { if (!callbacks[i]) vector = per_vq_vector = VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR; else if (vp_dev->msix_used_vectors < vp_dev->msix_vectors) per_vq_vector = vector = allocated_vectors++; else { vector = VP_MSIX_VQ_VECTOR; per_vq_vector = VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR; } Now, I can't find where msix_used_vectors is set, only once where it's incremented. It seems completely redundant and confusing now? And this "< vp_dev->msix_vectors" test is wrong? AFAICT there are three cases: 1) We don't have MSI, so we use a normal interrupt for all vqs (old style). This request_irq is done in vp_request_vectors. 2) We get some, but not enough for one per queue. We then use 2: one for changes, and one for all vqs. Requested in vp_request_vectors. 3) We get enough. Use one for changes, one per vq. Each vq requests in vp_find_vq. I suggest you be explicit, and don't do any request in vp_find_vq(). Do the per-vq request (case 3) in the find_vqs() loop, so vp_find_vq doesn't need to know anything except to do the iowrite16 if vector != VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR. Maybe an explicit "bool per_vq_vectors" would make it clearer, too. Note: this is partially my fault for not reviewing this code when it went in. I know Anthony is disclaiming virtio_pci :) Thanks, Rusty.