Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-Jul-23 11:57 UTC
[PATCHv2 1/2] virtio: fix double free_irq on device removal
msix_user_vectors counted both per-vq and shared/config vectors. This causes BUG_ON when device is removed, as free_vectors tries to free per-vq vectors. Count per-vq vectors separately so they are only freed by del_vq. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c index 193c8f0..a40e4f7 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct virtio_pci_device char (*msix_names)[256]; /* Number of available vectors */ unsigned msix_vectors; - /* Vectors allocated */ + /* Vectors allocated, excluding per-vq vectors if any */ unsigned msix_used_vectors; }; @@ -364,13 +364,15 @@ error_entries: static struct virtqueue *vp_find_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned index, void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *vq), - const char *name) + const char *name, + u16 vector, + u16 per_vq_vector) { struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev); struct virtio_pci_vq_info *info; struct virtqueue *vq; unsigned long flags, size; - u16 num, vector; + u16 num; int err; /* Select the queue we're interested in */ @@ -389,7 +391,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vp_find_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned index, info->queue_index = index; info->num = num; - info->vector = VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR; + info->vector = per_vq_vector; size = PAGE_ALIGN(vring_size(num, VIRTIO_PCI_VRING_ALIGN)); info->queue = alloc_pages_exact(size, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO); @@ -414,8 +416,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vp_find_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned index, info->vq = vq; /* allocate per-vq vector if available and necessary */ - if (callback && vp_dev->msix_used_vectors < vp_dev->msix_vectors) { - vector = vp_dev->msix_used_vectors; + if (info->vector != VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) { snprintf(vp_dev->msix_names[vector], sizeof *vp_dev->msix_names, "%s-%s", dev_name(&vp_dev->vdev.dev), name); err = request_irq(vp_dev->msix_entries[vector].vector, @@ -423,10 +424,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vp_find_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned index, vp_dev->msix_names[vector], vq); if (err) goto out_request_irq; - info->vector = vector; - ++vp_dev->msix_used_vectors; - } else - vector = VP_MSIX_VQ_VECTOR; + } if (callback && vp_dev->msix_enabled) { iowrite16(vector, vp_dev->ioaddr + VIRTIO_MSI_QUEUE_VECTOR); @@ -444,10 +442,8 @@ static struct virtqueue *vp_find_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned index, return vq; out_assign: - if (info->vector != VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) { + if (info->vector != VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) free_irq(vp_dev->msix_entries[info->vector].vector, vq); - --vp_dev->msix_used_vectors; - } out_request_irq: vring_del_virtqueue(vq); out_activate_queue: @@ -503,8 +499,10 @@ static int vp_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned nvqs, vq_callback_t *callbacks[], const char *names[]) { + struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev); + u16 vector, per_vq_vector; int vectors = 0; - int i, err; + int i, err, allocated_vectors; /* How many vectors would we like? */ for (i = 0; i < nvqs; ++i) @@ -515,8 +513,18 @@ static int vp_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned nvqs, if (err) goto error_request; + allocated_vectors = vp_dev->msix_used_vectors; for (i = 0; i < nvqs; ++i) { - vqs[i] = vp_find_vq(vdev, i, callbacks[i], names[i]); + if (!callbacks[i]) + vector = per_vq_vector = VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR; + else if (vp_dev->msix_used_vectors < vp_dev->msix_vectors) + per_vq_vector = vector = allocated_vectors++; + else { + vector = VP_MSIX_VQ_VECTOR; + per_vq_vector = VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR; + } + vqs[i] = vp_find_vq(vdev, i, callbacks[i], names[i], + vector, per_vq_vector); if (IS_ERR(vqs[i])) goto error_find; } -- 1.6.2.5
Rusty Russell
2009-Jul-24 12:24 UTC
[PATCHv2 1/2] virtio: fix double free_irq on device removal
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:27:31 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> msix_user_vectors counted both per-vq and shared/config vectors. > This causes BUG_ON when device is removed, as > free_vectors tries to free per-vq vectors.OK, I looked at this patch, then looked at this code (after it was applied). I'm still very confused. Looking at the call site for vp_find_vq: for (i = 0; i < nvqs; ++i) { if (!callbacks[i]) vector = per_vq_vector = VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR; else if (vp_dev->msix_used_vectors < vp_dev->msix_vectors) per_vq_vector = vector = allocated_vectors++; else { vector = VP_MSIX_VQ_VECTOR; per_vq_vector = VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR; } Now, I can't find where msix_used_vectors is set, only once where it's incremented. It seems completely redundant and confusing now? And this "< vp_dev->msix_vectors" test is wrong? AFAICT there are three cases: 1) We don't have MSI, so we use a normal interrupt for all vqs (old style). This request_irq is done in vp_request_vectors. 2) We get some, but not enough for one per queue. We then use 2: one for changes, and one for all vqs. Requested in vp_request_vectors. 3) We get enough. Use one for changes, one per vq. Each vq requests in vp_find_vq. I suggest you be explicit, and don't do any request in vp_find_vq(). Do the per-vq request (case 3) in the find_vqs() loop, so vp_find_vq doesn't need to know anything except to do the iowrite16 if vector != VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR. Maybe an explicit "bool per_vq_vectors" would make it clearer, too. Note: this is partially my fault for not reviewing this code when it went in. I know Anthony is disclaiming virtio_pci :) Thanks, Rusty.