Chris Healy
2013-Sep-09 16:56 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH 1/1] bridge: fix message_age_timer calculation
This changes the message_age_timer calculation to use the BPDU's max age as opposed to the local bridge's max age. This is in accordance with section 8.6.2.3.2 Step 2 of the 802.1D-1998 sprecification. With the current implementation, when running with very large bridge diameters, convergance will not always occur even if a root bridge is configured to have a longer max age. Tested successfully on bridge diameters of ~200. Signed-off-by: Chris Healy <cphealy at gmail.com> --- net/bridge/br_stp.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c index 1c0a50f..f1887ba 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static void br_record_config_information(struct net_bridge_port *p, p->designated_age = jiffies - bpdu->message_age; mod_timer(&p->message_age_timer, jiffies - + (p->br->max_age - bpdu->message_age)); + + (bpdu->max_age - bpdu->message_age)); } /* called under bridge lock */ -- 1.8.1.2
Stephen Hemminger
2013-Sep-10 18:41 UTC
Re: [PATCH 1/1] bridge: fix message_age_timer calculation
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 09:56:08 -0700 Chris Healy <cphealy@gmail.com> wrote:> This changes the message_age_timer calculation to use the BPDU''s max age as opposed to the local bridge''s max age. This is in accordance with section 8.6.2.3.2 Step 2 of the 802.1D-1998 sprecification. > > With the current implementation, when running with very large bridge diameters, convergance will not always occur even if a root bridge is configured to have a longer max age. > > Tested successfully on bridge diameters of ~200. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Healy <cphealy@gmail.com> > --- > net/bridge/br_stp.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c > index 1c0a50f..f1887ba 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c > @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static void br_record_config_information(struct net_bridge_port *p, > p->designated_age = jiffies - bpdu->message_age; > > mod_timer(&p->message_age_timer, jiffies > - + (p->br->max_age - bpdu->message_age)); > + + (bpdu->max_age - bpdu->message_age)); > } > > /* called under bridge lock */This makes sense. Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Stephen Hemminger
2013-Sep-10 18:41 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH 1/1] bridge: fix message_age_timer calculation
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 09:56:08 -0700 Chris Healy <cphealy at gmail.com> wrote:> This changes the message_age_timer calculation to use the BPDU's max age as opposed to the local bridge's max age. This is in accordance with section 8.6.2.3.2 Step 2 of the 802.1D-1998 sprecification. > > With the current implementation, when running with very large bridge diameters, convergance will not always occur even if a root bridge is configured to have a longer max age. > > Tested successfully on bridge diameters of ~200. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Healy <cphealy at gmail.com> > --- > net/bridge/br_stp.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c > index 1c0a50f..f1887ba 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c > @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static void br_record_config_information(struct net_bridge_port *p, > p->designated_age = jiffies - bpdu->message_age; > > mod_timer(&p->message_age_timer, jiffies > - + (p->br->max_age - bpdu->message_age)); > + + (bpdu->max_age - bpdu->message_age)); > } > > /* called under bridge lock */This makes sense. Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
Sergei Shtylyov
2013-Sep-11 18:40 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH 1/1] bridge: fix message_age_timer calculation
Hello. On 09/09/2013 08:56 PM, Chris Healy wrote:> This changes the message_age_timer calculation to use the BPDU's max age as opposed to the local bridge's max age. This is in accordance with section 8.6.2.3.2 Step 2 of the 802.1D-1998 sprecification.You should wrap your changelog lines at 80 chars at most, preferably less.> With the current implementation, when running with very large bridge diameters, convergance will not always occur even if a root bridge is configured to have a longer max age.> Tested successfully on bridge diameters of ~200.> Signed-off-by: Chris Healy <cphealy at gmail.com>WBR, Sergei