lejeczek
2016-May-04 12:40 UTC
[libvirt-users] dhcpd (via systemd) @boottime which does not wait for the interface..
hi users I have my dhcpd to serve nothing but virbr0 (libvirt), OS is Centos 7.2 Dhcpd would not start, complaining like this: No subnet declaration for virbr0 (no IPv4 addresses). ** Ignoring requests on virbr0. If this is not what you want, please write a subnet declaration in your dhcpd.conf file for the network segment to which interface virbr0 is attached. ** ##SELECTION_END## and systemctl -l shows: ... systemd[1]: start request repeated too quickly for dhcpd.service ... but suffice to restart dhcpd and all works! I'v customized systemd's service conf, I've put: After=libvirtd.service Requisite=libvirtd.service but this did not help. Would you share your thoughts? Systemd list say it's libvirt (wrong)doing. many thanks. L.
Laine Stump
2016-May-06 11:41 UTC
Re: [libvirt-users] dhcpd (via systemd) @boottime which does not wait for the interface..
lejeczek
2016-May-12 16:23 UTC
Re: [libvirt-users] dhcpd (via systemd) @boottime which does not wait for the interface..
On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 07:41 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:> On 05/04/2016 08:40 AM, lejeczek wrote: > > > hi users > > > > > > I have my dhcpd to serve nothing but virbr0 (libvirt), OS is Centos > > 7.2 > > Dhcpd would not start, complaining like this: > > > > Is virbr0 created by libvirt as part of one of its "virtual > networks"? If so, why are you using dhcpd rather than the dnsmasq > that libvirt already runs for it (and how are you managing to > terminate the dnsmasq process run by libvirt so its listening socket > doesn't conflict with the listener setup by dhcpd?)yes, set up like this: <forward mode='route'/> <bridge name='virbr0' stp='on' delay='0'/> It really is simple plain vanilla setup, maybe not common but simple, should be easy to reproduce: libvirtd's only one virbr0 and dhcpd to listen only on this iface.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No subnet declaration for virbr0 (no IPv4 addresses). > > > > > > ** Ignoring requests on virbr0. If this is not what > > > > > > you want, please write a subnet declaration > > > > > > in your dhcpd.conf file for the network segment > > > > > > to which interface virbr0 is attached. ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and systemctl -l shows: > > > > > > ... > > > > > > systemd[1]: start request repeated too quickly for > > dhcpd.service > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but suffice to restart dhcpd and all works! > > > > > > I'v customized systemd's service conf, I've put: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After=libvirtd.service > > > > > > Requisite=libvirtd.service > > > > > > > > > > > > If virbr0 is created by libvirt, it's already starting a dnsmasq > process to handle dhcp requests, so you don't need (and shouldn't be > able to start) dhcpd listening on it. If virbr0 *isn't* created by > libvirt, then the change to systemd's configuration won't have any > effect. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but this did not help. > > > > > > Would you share your thoughts? Systemd list say it's > > libvirt (wrong)doing. > > > > > > many thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > L. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > libvirt-users mailing list > >libvirt-users@redhat.com> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users> > > > > > > > > > > >
Seemingly Similar Threads
- dhcpd (via systemd) @boottime which does not wait for the interface..
- Re: dhcpd (via systemd) @boottime which does not wait for the interface..
- Re: dhcpd (via systemd) @boottime which does not wait for the interface..
- How to disable dnsmasq from starting automatically with libvirtd
- Re: How libvirt interacts with dhcpd?