libvirt users - Oct 2014 - Re: sr-vio on intel while virsh chooses rtl8139 for model type

hi everybody

I'd presume virsh makes the best possible choice, right?
It is that just seems bit... odd having realtek in guest and 
Intel's VF on host, no?

regards

On 10/03/2014 11:38 AM, lejeczek wrote:
> hi everybody
>
> I'd presume virsh makes the best possible choice, right?
> It is that just seems bit... odd having realtek in guest and Intel's
> VF on host, no?
This can safely be ignored - in the case of an SRIOV VF that is assigned
to the guest using PCI passthrough device assignment, the "model"
attribute is meaningless, but libvirt will always fill in the default
value (which is rtl8139) in the XML to prevent surprises if the default
emulated NIC model ever changes.

(I am assuming that you're using either <interface
type='hostdev'> or
<interface type='network'> pointint to a network that has
<forward
mode='hostdev'>. If you are instead using
"type='direct'" or a network
with "<forward mode='bridge|passthrough|vepa'>" then the
model *does*
matter, and you probably want to set it to "virtio", which is *not*
the
default because not all guest OSes have a virtio network driver by
default (e.g. MS Windows))

On 03/10/14 17:15, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 10/03/2014 11:38 AM, lejeczek wrote:
>> hi everybody
>>
>> I'd presume virsh makes the best possible choice, right?
>> It is that just seems bit... odd having realtek in guest and
Intel's
>> VF on host, no?
> This can safely be ignored - in the case of an SRIOV VF that is assigned
> to the guest using PCI passthrough device assignment, the "model"
> attribute is meaningless, but libvirt will always fill in the default
> value (which is rtl8139) in the XML to prevent surprises if the default
> emulated NIC model ever changes.
>
> (I am assuming that you're using either <interface
type='hostdev'> or
> <interface type='network'> pointint to a network that has
<forward
> mode='hostdev'>. If you are instead using
"type='direct'" or a network
> with "<forward mode='bridge|passthrough|vepa'>"
then the model *does*
> matter, and you probably want to set it to "virtio", which is
*not* the
> default because not all guest OSes have a virtio network driver by
> default (e.g. MS Windows))
I don't use forward (unless libvirt does that for me) but I 
have a pool like this one:
<interface type='network'>
       <mac address='52:54:00:51:af:0e'/>
       <source network='passpool-enp2s0f0'/>
       <model type='rtl8139'/>
       <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00'
slot='0x07' function='0x0'/>
     </interface>
In a win 2008 guest OS is missing drivers for this device 
and I wonder what is that it gets?
>