Libguestfs - May 2022 - [libguestfs PATCH 4/4] tests/regressions: remove "iface"-based restrictions

For the whole series:

Reviewed-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com>

Do you think it makes sense to completely drop the two regression
tests in patch 4?  They're testing something that (probably) cannot go
wrong now.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html

On 05/04/22 20:50, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> 
> For the whole series:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com>
> 
> Do you think it makes sense to completely drop the two regression
> tests in patch 4?  They're testing something that (probably) cannot go
> wrong now.
We can do that, but then a few more test cases should be modified
perhaps, for consistency. If you grep the tree for "iface", you'll
find
a few test cases that pass various "iface" params (off-hand I recall
Ruby, OCaml, and Java-language test cases -- I think those are all
"bindtests"). I figured those tests still made sense (for ensuring API
compat), so I didn't remove the iface params, and/or the test cases that
only differrerd from the rest in their iface params. And then I figured
the rhbz regression tests should stay too (just be relaxed).

If we drop the latter (the rhbz regression tests), should we still keep
the other (language bindings) tests?

Thanks,
Laszlo