On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:41:01PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:34:21PM +0200, NoxDaFox wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I have the following typical scenario: given one or more qcow2 base images > > I clone them with COW and start the VMs. > > > > At a certain point I'd like to inspect them in order to see their evolution > > compared to the known base images. To do so I was thinking about taking a > > disk snapshot of each VM and inspect its content through libguestfs (using > > it's Python bindings). > > > > Obviously I need the base image in order for libguestfs to correctly guess > > the OS, the FS structure etc.. Problem is that that point when I inspect > > the disk I get the whole disk state including the base image content (30K+ > > files and directories). > > > > This is not an issue but it's a very heavy operation considering that some > > of the snapshots are few megabytes while the base images are several > > gigabytes. > > > > Is there a way to programmatically instruct libguestfs to limit the > > inspection to the sole snapshot? > > Would it work as well with other disk format (vmdk linked clones for > > example)? > > > > For better comprehension I'll show the sequence I'm doing (I might do it > > wrong of course): > > > > virsh -c "qemu:///system" snapshot-create --disk-only <domain-ID> > > > > I get the snapshot location from its XML description and then: > > > > qemu-img convert -f qcow2 -O qcow2 base_image.qcow2 snapshot.qcow2 > > This makes a copy of the whole disk image. It's also not a consistent > (point in time) copy.Oh I see that you're copying the _snapshot_ that you created with libvirt; it's not a whole disk copy. There's still not any point in doing this, and what I said below stands.> > At that point I mount it through libguestfs and inspect its content. > > As long as you use the 'readonly=1' flag (which is really *essential*, > else you'll get disk corruption), you can just point libguestfs at the > base image: > > g = guestfs.GuestFS (python_return_dict=True) > g.add_drive_opts ("base_image.qcow2", format="qcow2", readonly=1) > > That also doesn't get you a consistent snapshot, but it'll work most > of the time, and give you a clear error in libguestfs when it doesn't > (and won't corrupt your base disk or anything like that, provided > you're using readonly=1). > > The effect of the readonly=1 flag is to create an external snapshot. > It is roughly the equivalent of doing: > > qemu-img create -f qcow2 -b base_image snapshot.qcow2 > < point libguestfs at snapshot.qcow2 > > > If you want lightweight, consistent, point-in-time snapshots (which it > sounds like you do), qemu has recently been adding this capability. > See the 'drive-backup' monitor command. I've not tried using that and > I don't know if it is wired up through libvirt, but libguestfs should > be able to consume it since it's just an NBD source.Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:43:30PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: [. . .]> > This makes a copy of the whole disk image. It's also not a consistent > > (point in time) copy. > > Oh I see that you're copying the _snapshot_ that you created with > libvirt; it's not a whole disk copy. There's still not any point in > doing this, and what I said below stands. > > > > At that point I mount it through libguestfs and inspect its content. > > > > As long as you use the 'readonly=1' flag (which is really *essential*, > > else you'll get disk corruption), you can just point libguestfs at the > > base image: > > > > g = guestfs.GuestFS (python_return_dict=True) > > g.add_drive_opts ("base_image.qcow2", format="qcow2", readonly=1) > > > > That also doesn't get you a consistent snapshot, but it'll work most > > of the time, and give you a clear error in libguestfs when it doesn't > > (and won't corrupt your base disk or anything like that, provided > > you're using readonly=1). > > > > The effect of the readonly=1 flag is to create an external snapshot. > > It is roughly the equivalent of doing: > > > > qemu-img create -f qcow2 -b base_image snapshot.qcow2 > > < point libguestfs at snapshot.qcow2 > > > > > If you want lightweight, consistent, point-in-time snapshots (which it > > sounds like you do), qemu has recently been adding this capability. > > See the 'drive-backup' monitor command. I've not tried using thatA small QMP test for 'drive-backup': https://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/virt/test-qmp-drive-backup.txt> > and I don't know if it is wired up through libvirt,I don't see it wired up yet in libvirt current `git` master.> > but libguestfs should be able to consume it since it's just an NBD > > source.-- /kashyap
Richard W.M. Jones
2015-Mar-25 19:41 UTC
[Libguestfs] Point-in-time snapshots (was: Re: Inspection of disk snapshots)
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 07:38:03PM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:43:30PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > [. . .] > > > > This makes a copy of the whole disk image. It's also not a consistent > > > (point in time) copy. > > > > Oh I see that you're copying the _snapshot_ that you created with > > libvirt; it's not a whole disk copy. There's still not any point in > > doing this, and what I said below stands. > > > > > > At that point I mount it through libguestfs and inspect its content. > > > > > > As long as you use the 'readonly=1' flag (which is really *essential*, > > > else you'll get disk corruption), you can just point libguestfs at the > > > base image: > > > > > > g = guestfs.GuestFS (python_return_dict=True) > > > g.add_drive_opts ("base_image.qcow2", format="qcow2", readonly=1) > > > > > > That also doesn't get you a consistent snapshot, but it'll work most > > > of the time, and give you a clear error in libguestfs when it doesn't > > > (and won't corrupt your base disk or anything like that, provided > > > you're using readonly=1). > > > > > > The effect of the readonly=1 flag is to create an external snapshot. > > > It is roughly the equivalent of doing: > > > > > > qemu-img create -f qcow2 -b base_image snapshot.qcow2 > > > < point libguestfs at snapshot.qcow2 > > > > > > > If you want lightweight, consistent, point-in-time snapshots (which it > > > sounds like you do), qemu has recently been adding this capability. > > > See the 'drive-backup' monitor command. I've not tried using that > > A small QMP test for 'drive-backup': > > https://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/virt/test-qmp-drive-backup.txtThat's interesting, but even more interesting would be to see drive-backup writing to NBD.>From what I gather, drive-backup would take a nbd:... target, meaningthat it is the *client* (not the server). What's interesting is what you're supposed to connect to the server. (Maybe I'm wrong about this however) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Re: Point-in-time snapshots (was: Re: Inspection of disk snapshots)
- Re: Inspection of disk snapshots
- Re: Point-in-time snapshots (was: Re: Inspection of disk snapshots)
- Re: Inspection of disk snapshots
- Re: Point-in-time snapshots (was: Re: Inspection of disk snapshots)