Libguestfs - Apr 2012 - [libvirt] [test-API 2/3] Add the better copyright statements in scripts

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:22:48PM +0800, Osier Yang
wrote:
> [ CC to Rich ]
> 
> On 2012?04?17? 19:18, Osier Yang wrote:
> >On 2012?04?17? 19:13, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:09:36PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> >>>On 2012?04?17? 19:04, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>>>On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 06:59:24PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> >>>>>The new copyright statements is:
> >>>>>
> >>>>><copyright>
> >>>>>Copyright (C) 2010-2012 Red Hat, Inc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>libvirt-test-API is free software; you can redistribute
it and/or
> >>>>>modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public
License as
> >>>>>published by the Free Software Foundation, either
version 2 of the
> >>>>>License, or (at your option) any later version.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>This program is distributed in the hope that it will be
useful,
> >>>>>but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied
warranties of
> >>>>>TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR
A PARTICULAR
> >>>>>PURPOSE.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>You should have received a copy of the GNU General
Public License
> >>>>>along with this program; if not, write to the Free
Software
> >>>>>Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139,
USA.
> >>>>></copyright>
> >>>>
> >>>>I'm fairly sure that address is outdated - everywhere
in libvirt
> >>>>code uses
> >>>>
> >>>>* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General
Public
> >>>>* License along with this library; if not, write to the
Free Software
> >>>>* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA
> >>>>02111-1307 USA
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Thanks for the reminding, will post a v2, then think we need to
> >>>update the address in libvirt codes too?
> >>
> >>Hmm, I wonder if we are better off just removing the address
> >>completely. There are no end of bug reports in Fedora reviews
> >>about outdated addresses and the FSF have moved locations
> >>multiple times. I see GNULIB now just writes:
> >>
> >>* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
> >>License
> >>* along with this program. If not,
see<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> >>
> >
> >I found this when checking the GNU website mins ago. Yeah, it's
better
> >, per they moves from time to time, ;-)
> >
> 
> @Rich, I had to say: I copied the last 3 sentences (the address part)
> from libguestfs. Perhaps it needs the updating too.
They've moved again?!

We are currently using:

Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor,
Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA

and went through a big process of fixing every file to use this
address a little while back.

  commit 04ea1375c55aa67df4e7fc61dbb534111767f3b6
  Author: Matthew Booth <mbooth at redhat.com>
  Date:   Tue Nov 8 14:27:49 2011 +0000

      Update FSF address.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:41:19PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:22:48PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> > [ CC to Rich ]
> > 
> > On 2012?04?17? 19:18, Osier Yang wrote:
> > >On 2012?04?17? 19:13, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > >>On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:09:36PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> > >>>On 2012?04?17? 19:04, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > >>>>On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 06:59:24PM +0800, Osier Yang
wrote:
> > >>>>>The new copyright statements is:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>><copyright>
> > >>>>>Copyright (C) 2010-2012 Red Hat, Inc.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>libvirt-test-API is free software; you can
redistribute it and/or
> > >>>>>modify it under the terms of the GNU General
Public License as
> > >>>>>published by the Free Software Foundation, either
version 2 of the
> > >>>>>License, or (at your option) any later version.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>This program is distributed in the hope that it
will be useful,
> > >>>>>but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied
warranties of
> > >>>>>TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY or
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
> > >>>>>PURPOSE.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>You should have received a copy of the GNU General
Public License
> > >>>>>along with this program; if not, write to the Free
Software
> > >>>>>Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA
02139, USA.
> > >>>>></copyright>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>I'm fairly sure that address is outdated -
everywhere in libvirt
> > >>>>code uses
> > >>>>
> > >>>>* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser
General Public
> > >>>>* License along with this library; if not, write to
the Free Software
> > >>>>* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330,
Boston, MA
> > >>>>02111-1307 USA
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>Thanks for the reminding, will post a v2, then think we
need to
> > >>>update the address in libvirt codes too?
> > >>
> > >>Hmm, I wonder if we are better off just removing the address
> > >>completely. There are no end of bug reports in Fedora reviews
> > >>about outdated addresses and the FSF have moved locations
> > >>multiple times. I see GNULIB now just writes:
> > >>
> > >>* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General
Public
> > >>License
> > >>* along with this program. If not,
see<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> > >>
> > >
> > >I found this when checking the GNU website mins ago. Yeah,
it's better
> > >, per they moves from time to time, ;-)
> > >
> > 
> > @Rich, I had to say: I copied the last 3 sentences (the address part)
> > from libguestfs. Perhaps it needs the updating too.
> 
> They've moved again?!
> 
> We are currently using:
> 
> Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor,
> Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
> 
> and went through a big process of fixing every file to use this
> address a little while back.
> 
>   commit 04ea1375c55aa67df4e7fc61dbb534111767f3b6
>   Author: Matthew Booth <mbooth at redhat.com>
>   Date:   Tue Nov 8 14:27:49 2011 +0000
> 
>       Update FSF address.
Actually, I think it is libvirt that is at error here. The address i
posted above is wrong. This all just goes to show we shouldn't include
the street address at all, since no one can ever remember which one
is current :-)

/me will update libvirt to use the web address instead.

Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

On 2012?04?17? 19:41, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:22:48PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
>> [ CC to Rich ]
>>
>> On 2012?04?17? 19:18, Osier Yang wrote:
>>> On 2012?04?17? 19:13, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:09:36PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
>>>>> On 2012?04?17? 19:04, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 06:59:24PM +0800, Osier Yang
wrote:
>>>>>>> The new copyright statements is:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <copyright>
>>>>>>> Copyright (C) 2010-2012 Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> libvirt-test-API is free software; you can
redistribute it and/or
>>>>>>> modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public
License as
>>>>>>> published by the Free Software Foundation, either
version 2 of the
>>>>>>> License, or (at your option) any later version.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This program is distributed in the hope that it
will be useful,
>>>>>>> but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied
warranties of
>>>>>>> TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS
FOR A PARTICULAR
>>>>>>> PURPOSE.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You should have received a copy of the GNU General
Public License
>>>>>>> along with this program; if not, write to the Free
Software
>>>>>>> Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA
02139, USA.
>>>>>>> </copyright>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm fairly sure that address is outdated -
everywhere in libvirt
>>>>>> code uses
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser
General Public
>>>>>> * License along with this library; if not, write to the
Free Software
>>>>>> * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston,
MA
>>>>>> 02111-1307 USA
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the reminding, will post a v2, then think we
need to
>>>>> update the address in libvirt codes too?
>>>>
>>>> Hmm, I wonder if we are better off just removing the address
>>>> completely. There are no end of bug reports in Fedora reviews
>>>> about outdated addresses and the FSF have moved locations
>>>> multiple times. I see GNULIB now just writes:
>>>>
>>>> * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General
Public
>>>> License
>>>> * along with this program. If not,
see<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I found this when checking the GNU website mins ago. Yeah, it's
better
>>> , per they moves from time to time, ;-)
>>>
>>
>> @Rich, I had to say: I copied the last 3 sentences (the address part)
>> from libguestfs. Perhaps it needs the updating too.
>
> They've moved again?!
>
> We are currently using:
>
> Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor,
> Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
>
> and went through a big process of fixing every file to use this
> address a little while back.
>
>    commit 04ea1375c55aa67df4e7fc61dbb534111767f3b6
>    Author: Matthew Booth<mbooth at redhat.com>
>    Date:   Tue Nov 8 14:27:49 2011 +0000
>
>        Update FSF address.
>
> Rich.
>
Ah, my libguestfs repo is *too* old, :-)

Osier