Hi, I want to use the dsmark, but it always says: "unkown qdisc", although I have enabled it (y in Network options), and I have my kernel recompiled. I am using SuSE 8.1, 2.4.20 Kernel, tc available at the HTB site (with already precompiled HTB queue). Can anybody find the problem? thx _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hello there, : I want to use the dsmark, but it always says: "unkown qdisc", although I : have enabled it (y in Network options), and I have my kernel recompiled. Not only must the kernel support diffserv/dsmark, but so must your iproute2 distribution. : I am using SuSE 8.1, 2.4.20 Kernel, tc available at the HTB site (with : already precompiled HTB queue). Try recompiling iproute2 after setting TC_CONFIG_DIFFSERV=y. If you like RPMs, you can always try building my RPM (written for RH, not SuSE). http://linux-ip.net/traffic-control/iproute-2.4.7-7.src.rpm * -Martin * Note, this includes the HTB patch for tc as well as compiling with diffserv support. There is no warranty express or implied. -- Martin A. Brown --- SecurePipe, Inc. --- mabrown@securepipe.com _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Wednesday 07 May 2003 18:34, sun reflex4 wrote:> Hi, > I want to use the dsmark, but it always says: "unkown qdisc", although I > have enabled it (y in Network options), and I have my kernel recompiled. > > I am using SuSE 8.1, 2.4.20 Kernel, tc available at the HTB site (with > already precompiled HTB queue). > > Can anybody find the problem?You have to enable Diffserv support in iproute2. Look at http://diffserv.sourceforge.net/ in iproute2 section. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
thanx for the help, it was bec. of the tc, i downloaded the source and "make"ed it. But the old one I had supports the HTB, whereas the new binary doesn''t support it (but dsmark already), is it a problem when I use both (one called tc & the other tc_new)?>From: "Martin A. Brown" <mabrown-lartc@securepipe.com> >To: sun reflex4 <sunreflex4@hotmail.com> >CC: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl >Subject: Re: [LARTC] dsmark, unkown >Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 12:50:58 -0500 (CDT) > >Hello there, > > : I want to use the dsmark, but it always says: "unkown qdisc", although >I > : have enabled it (y in Network options), and I have my kernel >recompiled. > >Not only must the kernel support diffserv/dsmark, but so must your >iproute2 distribution. > > : I am using SuSE 8.1, 2.4.20 Kernel, tc available at the HTB site (with > : already precompiled HTB queue). > >Try recompiling iproute2 after setting TC_CONFIG_DIFFSERV=y. > >If you like RPMs, you can always try building my RPM (written for RH, not >SuSE). > > http://linux-ip.net/traffic-control/iproute-2.4.7-7.src.rpm * > >-Martin > >* Note, this includes the HTB patch for tc as well as compiling with > diffserv support. There is no warranty express or implied. > >-- >Martin A. Brown --- SecurePipe, Inc. --- mabrown@securepipe.com >_________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Well, : thanx for the help, it was bec. of the tc, i downloaded the source and : "make"ed it. But the old one I had supports the HTB, whereas the new : binary doesn''t support it (but dsmark already), is it a problem when I : use both (one called tc & the other tc_new)? I don''t really know whether that''s advisable or not. I do not know of any problem this can cause, but why not try applying the htb patch [1]? It''s not so hard, and then you have a single binary to call instead of two different binaries. Maybe somebody else can answer your question about potential problems of using multiple tc binaries. Frankly, I think it''s probably mostly confusing for the human. -Martin [1] http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v3/htb3.6-020525.tgz -- Martin A. Brown --- SecurePipe, Inc. --- mabrown@securepipe.com _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/