similar to: dsmark, unkown

Hi! I am learning tcng without having experiance of tc and I am trying to build something that shall schedule traffic dependent on the value in the IPv4 packets ip_ttl field. I have read the tcng reference manual and cannot find information about forwarding. Is it possible to farward packets from ingress to egress without sending them upwards in layers?

hi, I''m a beginner with qdiscs and other lartc stuff. After reading the howto and other related documents (i.e. some papers about linux and diffserv), I decided to start with some test. I found some example script to implement simple diffserv using dsmark, but, just after the first command: tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 64 set_tc_index the system answered:

I ''m having a problem identical to one encountered on this list awhile back: >I''m trying to configure dsmark qdisc on 2.6.11.4 user mode linux and >tc from iproute2-2.6.11-050314. > > >I think I have some mismatch in my setup since adding dsmark qdisc >fails *unless* I specify "set_tc_index" argument which I believe should >be optional:

Hi, There is some extra information in this email! I am working on implementing Diffserv on linux project. I am using suse 8.0 professional kernel 2.4.21. I have the following RPM:iproute2-2.4.7-697.rpm This supports a number of linux qdisc like cbq, htb among many others but it has no support for DSMARK, which I wish to use. Does anyone know of any patch that I could used or any other solution

I''m successfully using HTB + GRED to shape traffic based on the DSCP field. I would like to strip the DSCP and possibly replace it with normal ToS bits on egress traffic leaving my network. Leaving DSCP set is pointless, and could potentially cause problems with some ISPs that use DSCP internally I suppose. Setting ToS bits would seem ideal as most networks still honor it to varying

I found following paragraph in the man page of iproute2. equalize allow packet by packet randomization on multipath routes. Without this modifier, the route will be frozen to one selected nexthop, so that load splitting will only occur on per-flow base. equalize only works if the kernel is patched. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Now, where

Can I add routes to rt_tables by hand with the vi editor? If I add a route to that file, it will be there if I reboot the box? I am sure there are stupid questions but I can''t find the answer into the papers I have here. Luis Miguel Cruz Miranda. CCNA - Systems Administrator _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

hi thanks for your reply heh "Example: ip del rule pref 32742" is syntically wrong :) and when i tried "ip rule del 32742" it gives me error # ip rule del 32742 Error: argument "32742" is wrong: Failed to parse rule type so how to get get of these extra rules? 0: from all lookup local 32742: from all fwmark 0x2 lookup squid.out 32743: from all fwmark 0x2

Hello list members, I notice here that the --server option is listed as undocumented. http://rsync.samba.org/rsync/fom-serve/cache/88.html My question is that the --server option is not documented, and I'd like not to build functionality into one of my systems without trusting that it will be there in the future. I was able to find the --server option simply by watching the rsync entries

Hello all, Please could someone help me with this, I have been trying for days to get this to work. I would like to have BE, AF & EF classes with HTB qdisc. I can''t find any scripts online where this has been done. If I enable this filter: #tc filter add dev eth0 parent 2:0 protocol ip prio 1 \ #tcindex mask 0xf0 shift 4 pass_on then BE & AF classification seems to be fine but

I am running a public core router using private links from my provider. Details: RH7.3 9 interfaces (all Intel) eth0 is default gateway and has a private IP address all other interfaces are links to other routers or networks eth3 has a public IP address The core router will rarely need to access sites out on the internet, but when it does it cannot get there because the eth0 has a private IP

I have an htb qdisc setup and it is shaping my traffic wonderfully but I''ve just recently started taking a look at the output from the command tc -s class ls dev eth? Looking at the "rate" line I thought to myself..."cool I can use this to graph throughput avg.es without having to worry about the "Sent bytes" rolling over or being lost when the htb qdisc is

Hy, I would want to mark the packets that are entering in a machine, with a mark for using diffserv with DSMARK. My machine has 2 interfaces, a ethernet and a wireless. The ethernet interface is eth1 and the other is wifi0. Firs, I would want to test that I would be able to mark the tos of the paquets that I would be receiving, for this I write in the console of my linux: iptables -A

ive got problems with my network (120 people) ive got big pings (300ms)m whereas there are normally about 19ms. i do not know if my qos is proper (fast i mean). www.tdi.pozman.pl/fir2 - my qos www.tdi.pozman.pl/rules - my firewall can sb tell me if do it ok ? -- *Dariusz ''tdi'' Dwornikowski | Gentoo | admin at pozman.pl |

Assuming if I have rules matching the same packet, the one chosen is the lower preference value or the high ? For example # ip rule list .... 100 from 192.168.1.0/24 lookup main 200 from all fwmark 5 lookup first ..... Packet is matching both rules, the one with priority/preference 100 or 200 is selected ? _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /

Hello, everyone! I would like to solve the following problem. Btw, I''m terribly sorry about the pseudo-asciiart, but that''s all I can paint as a tropology. I''m hoping it''ll be enough. ----Internet---- | | | eth0 machine A routing+ipchains eth1 | ------------------ machine B So, given I''m running kernel 2.4.19 and using ipchains

I''m having trouble routing on high fwmarks, I want to use a lot of different marks for 2 routes so that I can QoS based on the marks ip rule looks like this: 0: from all lookup local 32751: from all fwmark 31 lookup dslout 32752: from all fwmark 30 lookup dslout 32753: from all fwmark 29 lookup dslout 32754: from all fwmark 28 lookup dslout 32755: from

I have a computer with two interfaces, say with addresses 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2. I want to set up routing such that when I ping 192.168.1.1 it goes out through 192.168.1.2 and not to the local interface. Is this possible - all my attempts so far have been unsuccessful? If so, pointers, etc. would be gratefully appreciated. Jim -- Jim Redman (505) 662 5156 x85

hi I have trying to remove the extra rules from my routing tables, however with no luck Also I want to know these duplicate entries have an effect on packets going routed? I have this overwhelming rules lists from my predessor who added the "ip rule add fwmark" entries in firewall script, and on each run of firewall script its creates an extra entry in routing table. Now what I want to

Hi all, After a long reading of the LARTC, I were able to set up a working HTB config on my firewall. But my question is : Can I use a "ip less" box to do QoS ? With bridging software (or even without?) or thing like this and use an u32 filter to direct the traffic to the right class ? In other words, I can''t modify the existing network config or inster into (netmask is