All, I plan to config my network by using CBQ (Attached the configuration files). I want to do a packet prioritization instead traffic shaping (perhaps in the future I will need it). The result that I want : 1. HTTP gets the 1st priority 2. SMTP and some other packet get the 2nd 3. FTP gets the 3rd Should I configure the "priority default"? (I did it in Cisco router, last time) Your answer is very appreciated. Many thanks for your help. Rgds, Awie _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Sorry to forget informing that I used CBQ.init Thx & Rgds, Awie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Awie" <awie@eksadata.com> To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 10:52 PM Subject: [LARTC] Configuration of CBQ> All, > > I plan to config my network by using CBQ (Attached the configurationfiles).> I want to do a packet prioritization instead traffic shaping (perhaps inthe> future I will need it). > > The result that I want : > > 1. HTTP gets the 1st priority > 2. SMTP and some other packet get the 2nd > 3. FTP gets the 3rd > > Should I configure the "priority default"? (I did it in Cisco router, last > time) > > Your answer is very appreciated. Many thanks for your help. > > Rgds, > > Awie > > > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ >_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Sunday 27 April 2003 16:52, Awie wrote:> All, > > I plan to config my network by using CBQ (Attached the configuration > files). I want to do a packet prioritization instead traffic shaping > (perhaps in the future I will need it). > > The result that I want : > > 1. HTTP gets the 1st priority > 2. SMTP and some other packet get the 2nd > 3. FTP gets the 3rd > > Should I configure the "priority default"? (I did it in Cisco router, last > time) > > Your answer is very appreciated. Many thanks for your help.What do you mean with priority?? Do you mean that all HTTP traffic should be send first? If you do, then you a big download can kill all FTP or SMTP traffic. To prevent this, you have to shape the traffic. Isn''t it better to say that http can always use at least 60% of the link? If there is no other traffic, HTTP can use 100%. Ftp can use 100% traffic, but of there is other traffic, it will fal back to 10. So something like this: HTTP : 60 % SMTP : 30 % FTP : 10 % Traffic that can use a higher priority is real-time traffic like telnet, ssh or traffic that needs low delays like ACK. Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Stef, Thanks for your advise, it should be a better idea than mine. Anyway, how can I make that config? Here I attach my config, but I think it is still not a correct one. Thx & Rgds, Awie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stef Coene" <stef.coene@docum.org> To: "Awie" <awie@eksadata.com>; <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 11:25 PM Subject: Re: [LARTC] Configuration of CBQ> On Sunday 27 April 2003 16:52, Awie wrote: > > All, > > > > I plan to config my network by using CBQ (Attached the configuration > > files). I want to do a packet prioritization instead traffic shaping > > (perhaps in the future I will need it). > > > > The result that I want : > > > > 1. HTTP gets the 1st priority > > 2. SMTP and some other packet get the 2nd > > 3. FTP gets the 3rd > > > > Should I configure the "priority default"? (I did it in Cisco router,last> > time) > > > > Your answer is very appreciated. Many thanks for your help. > What do you mean with priority?? Do you mean that all HTTP traffic shouldbe> send first? If you do, then you a big download can kill all FTP or SMTP > traffic. To prevent this, you have to shape the traffic. > > Isn''t it better to say that http can always use at least 60% of the link?If> there is no other traffic, HTTP can use 100%. Ftp can use 100% traffic,but> of there is other traffic, it will fal back to 10. > > So something like this: > HTTP : 60 % > SMTP : 30 % > FTP : 10 % > > Traffic that can use a higher priority is real-time traffic like telnet,ssh> or traffic that needs low delays like ACK. > > Stef > > -- > > stef.coene@docum.org > "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" > http://www.docum.org/ > #lartc @ irc.oftc.net > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ >