Hello I have 2 network cards and i will use those in the same network. eth0 is 100Mbit and eth1 is 1000Mbit. But eth1 is not always connected to the network. The ip from bouth network cards is 192.168.0.20 . I need routing balancing but i have no idea how can i do this. And if one of the both network cards are not connected 100% of the traffic must go over the other card. Anyone a idea? _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hi
iam following the Julian Nano.txt, iam able to setup all
but when i check the following command
[root@pdn root]# ip route list table 222
default proto static
nexthop via 202.x.x.254 dev eth0 weight 256 dead onlink pervasive
nexthop via 203.x.x.17 dev eth1 weight 1
why iam getting this dead onlink pervasive, the document says i should get
weight 1
what ism doing wrong with this setup
some one suggest me
thanks
hare
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hello, On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, hare ram wrote:> iam following the Julian Nano.txt, iam able to setup all > but when i check the following command > > [root@pdn root]# ip route list table 222 > default proto static > nexthop via 202.x.x.254 dev eth0 weight 256 dead onlink pervasive > nexthop via 203.x.x.17 dev eth1 weight 1This smells like one iproute utility bug, just upgrade to iproute2 from Year 2002 which fixes similar problem. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hi iam using redhat 8.0 with Latest Kernel 2.4.18-18.0 with iproute [root@pdn root]# rpm -q iproute iproute-2.4.7-5 is this Corect or i need to still upgrade if so, i did not find latest than this thanks hare ----- Original Message ----- From: "Julian Anastasov" <ja@ssi.bg> To: "hare ram" <hareram@sol.net.in> Cc: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 10:12 PM Subject: Re: [LARTC] Problem With Load Balancing the Links> > Hello, > > On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, hare ram wrote: > > > iam following the Julian Nano.txt, iam able to setup all > > but when i check the following command > > > > [root@pdn root]# ip route list table 222 > > default proto static > > nexthop via 202.x.x.254 dev eth0 weight 256 dead onlinkpervasive> > nexthop via 203.x.x.17 dev eth1 weight 1 > > This smells like one iproute utility bug, just upgrade to iproute2 > from Year 2002 which fixes similar problem. > > Regards > > -- > Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ >_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hello, On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, hare ram wrote:> iam using redhat 8.0 with Latest Kernel > 2.4.18-18.0 > with iproute > [root@pdn root]# rpm -q iproute > iproute-2.4.7-5I''m not sure if 2.4.7-5 covers the desired version but here it is: ftp://ftp.inr.ac.ru/ip-routing/iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss020116-try.tar.gz> is this Corect or i need to still upgrade > if so, i did not find latest than thisYou can always list the above directory for latest tarballs> thanks > hareRegards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hi thanks, for the suggestion let me look and install this latest one as you have mentioned in the documents, the last time should be default, but why iam getting 253 here 0: from all lookup local 50: from all lookup main 201: from 202.63.96.0/24 lookup 201 202: from 202.63.111.150/24 lookup 202 222: from all lookup 222 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup 253 and iam not able to Ping or go out from My gateway IP i can only Ping my Gateway IP''s thanks hare ----- Original Message ----- From: "Julian Anastasov" <ja@ssi.bg> To: "hare ram" <hareram@sol.net.in> Cc: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 3:57 PM Subject: Re: [LARTC] Problem With Load Balancing the Links> > Hello, > > On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, hare ram wrote: > > > iam using redhat 8.0 with Latest Kernel > > 2.4.18-18.0 > > with iproute > > [root@pdn root]# rpm -q iproute > > iproute-2.4.7-5 > > I''m not sure if 2.4.7-5 covers the desired version but here it is: > > ftp://ftp.inr.ac.ru/ip-routing/iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss020116-try.tar.gz > > > is this Corect or i need to still upgrade > > if so, i did not find latest than this > > You can always list the above directory for latest tarballs > > > thanks > > hare > > Regards > > -- > Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ >_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hello, On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, hare ram wrote:> as you have mentioned in the documents, the last time should be default, but > why iam getting 253 hereTable "default" (253) is always there but we don''t use it because we want table "main" before 201 and 202.> 0: from all lookup local > 50: from all lookup main > 201: from 202.63.96.0/24 lookup 201 > 202: from 202.63.111.150/24 lookup 202 > 222: from all lookup 222 > 32766: from all lookup main > 32767: from all lookup 253 > > and iam not able to Ping or go out from My gateway IP > i can only Ping my Gateway IP''sCheck the settings again.> thanks > hareRegards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/