klibc - Jul 2009 - [PATCH] fix warning include/signal.h:47:5: warning: "SIGRTMAX" is not defined

---
 usr/include/signal.h |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/usr/include/signal.h b/usr/include/signal.h
index a513282..4ed65bc 100644
--- a/usr/include/signal.h
+++ b/usr/include/signal.h
@@ -44,10 +44,12 @@ typedef int sig_atomic_t;
 /* The kernel header files are inconsistent whether or not
    SIGRTMAX is inclusive or exclusive.  POSIX seems to state that
    it's inclusive, however. */
+#ifdef SIGRTMAX
 #if SIGRTMAX >= _NSIG
 # undef  SIGRTMAX
 # define SIGRTMAX (_NSIG-1)
 #endif
+#endif
 
 __extern const char *const sys_siglist[_NSIG];
 __extern const char *const sys_sigabbrev[_NSIG];

On 07/16/2009 04:00 PM, Jon Ringle wrote:
> ---
>  usr/include/signal.h |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/usr/include/signal.h b/usr/include/signal.h
> index a513282..4ed65bc 100644
> --- a/usr/include/signal.h
> +++ b/usr/include/signal.h
> @@ -44,10 +44,12 @@ typedef int sig_atomic_t;
>  /* The kernel header files are inconsistent whether or not
>     SIGRTMAX is inclusive or exclusive.  POSIX seems to state that
>     it's inclusive, however. */
> +#ifdef SIGRTMAX
>  #if SIGRTMAX >= _NSIG
>  # undef  SIGRTMAX
>  # define SIGRTMAX (_NSIG-1)
>  #endif
> +#endif
>  
This is a much bigger problem... if SIGRTMAX is undefined then we are
using signal numbers blind.  What configuration is this on?

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.