Thomas B. Rücker:> After all, Icecast is just another web server. > > Please note the absence of 8000 and 8443. Neither are officially > specified for WWW type HTTP(S). They are commonly used as such, but 80 > and 443 are *much* better choices and should be preferred.makes sense, but if my webserver needs to serve http/s from the same IP, that would not work. Unless I want to use Icecast as a nginx or apache replacement ;)
On 7/31/19 2:44 PM, unosonic wrote:> Thomas B. Rücker: >> After all, Icecast is just another web server. >> >> Please note the absence of 8000 and 8443. Neither are officially >> specified for WWW type HTTP(S). They are commonly used as such, but 80 >> and 443 are *much* better choices and should be preferred. > makes sense, but if my webserver needs to serve http/s from the same IP, > that would not work. Unless I want to use Icecast as a nginx or apache > replacement ;)You *can* run it on any port. 80/443 is clearly preferred and servers or IP addresses, especially IPv6, are cheap. If I'd have to run a production environment, I wouldn't spend a second considering that matter and spin up a second machine or IP address. TBR
Perhaps it is a Karl Heyes feature addition, but I can access my Icecast KH server with http and https URL's on the same port. http://s2.stationplaylist.com:9000 https://s2.stationplaylist.com:9000 Ross. -----Original Message----- From: Icecast [mailto:icecast-bounces at xiph.org] On Behalf Of Thomas B. Rücker Sent: Thursday, 1 August 2019 4:20 a.m. To: icecast at xiph.org Subject: Re: [Icecast] SSL-Question On 7/31/19 2:44 PM, unosonic wrote:> Thomas B. Rücker: >> After all, Icecast is just another web server. >> >> Please note the absence of 8000 and 8443. Neither are officially >> specified for WWW type HTTP(S). They are commonly used as such, but >> 80 and 443 are *much* better choices and should be preferred. > makes sense, but if my webserver needs to serve http/s from the same > IP, that would not work. Unless I want to use Icecast as a nginx or > apache replacement ;)You *can* run it on any port. 80/443 is clearly preferred and servers or IP addresses, especially IPv6, are cheap. If I'd have to run a production environment, I wouldn't spend a second considering that matter and spin up a second machine or IP address. TBR _______________________________________________ Icecast mailing list Icecast at xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast
On 2019-07-31 09:44, unosonic wrote:> Thomas B. Rücker: >> After all, Icecast is just another web server. >> >> Please note the absence of 8000 and 8443. Neither are officially >> specified for WWW type HTTP(S). They are commonly used as such, but 80 >> and 443 are *much* better choices and should be preferred. > > makes sense, but if my webserver needs to serve http/s from the same > IP, > that would not work. Unless I want to use Icecast as a nginx or apache > replacement ;)Uno, could you create a sub-domain, like radio.yoursite.com, and have it point to the Icecast server?
Hello!
Sorry, but SSL in my windows where is installed icecast not work.
Create certificate (.crt) and convert to .pem with openssl x509 -in
mycert.crt -out mycert.pem -outform PEM
certificate.pem copy to c:/icecast/cert/
Edit icecast.xml:
<ssl-certificate>./cert/icecast.pem</ssl-certificate>
<listen-socket>
<port>8443</port>
<ssl>1</ssl>
</listen-socket>
I don't know what can I do wrong
V V pet., 2. avg. 2019 ob 03:47 je oseba <webmaster at
berean-biblechurch.org>
napisala:
> On 2019-07-31 09:44, unosonic wrote:
> > Thomas B. Rücker:
> >> After all, Icecast is just another web server.
> >>
> >> Please note the absence of 8000 and 8443. Neither are officially
> >> specified for WWW type HTTP(S). They are commonly used as such,
but 80
> >> and 443 are *much* better choices and should be preferred.
> >
> > makes sense, but if my webserver needs to serve http/s from the same
> > IP,
> > that would not work. Unless I want to use Icecast as a nginx or apache
> > replacement ;)
>
> Uno, could you create a sub-domain, like radio.yoursite.com, and have it
> point to the Icecast server?
> _______________________________________________
> Icecast mailing list
> Icecast at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20200611/1a3e0737/attachment.html>