On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 02:42, Geoff Shang wrote:> Hi, > > Speex does belong to the Xiph family of codecs. > > My understanding is that Icecast can stream Ogg Speex. I'm not aware of > any streamers that can stream it to Icecast though. I would think that at > least Ogg123 (compiled with Speex support) and Illiminable's DirectShow > filters would be able to play this, and perhaps some other apps as well.The current trunk/release code doesn't handle Ogg Speex, it should filter the speex stream out. Getting it to stream is not a big problem, I have it under my branch currently> I'm particularly interested in knowing if there's anything can stream a > Speex source to Icecast.libshout trunk can send it, although I don't think it's timed just yet. karl.
Joern Nettingsmeier
2005-Feb-21 14:26 UTC
[Icecast] can icecast broadcast in SPEEX format?
Karl Heyes wrote:> On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 02:42, Geoff Shang wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Speex does belong to the Xiph family of codecs. >> >>My understanding is that Icecast can stream Ogg Speex. I'm not aware of >>any streamers that can stream it to Icecast though. I would think that at >>least Ogg123 (compiled with Speex support) and Illiminable's DirectShow >>filters would be able to play this, and perhaps some other apps as well. > > > The current trunk/release code doesn't handle Ogg Speex, it should > filter the speex stream out. Getting it to stream is not a big problem, > I have it under my branch currentlycool. any chances of getting a functional alpha release out before april? i'd really like to test this. btw, karl, what it the current status of -kh? is it still the most current devel branch? regards, j?rn
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 22:26, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:> cool. any chances of getting a functional alpha release out before > april? i'd really like to test this.Ogg Speex is already in my branch, it should port over to trunk fairly easily. Check SVN or tarballs at http://mediacast1.com/~karl and yes 2.1-kh6 is comparable with the 2.2.0 release.> btw, karl, what it the current status of -kh? is it still the most > current devel branch?sure, I have some updates to go in, I'll do a 2.2-kh1 soon enough, but currently 2.1-kh6 has shown to be been very stable. The clients need to be checked though, I'm not sure on the state of those yet karl.