Icecast - Aug 2004 - Winamp security hole

>From: EvilOverlord <eviloverlord@kucs.net>
>Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org
>To: icecast@xiph.org
>Subject: [icecast] Winamp security hole
>Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 23:14:30 +0100
>
>If like me you can't bear the idea of leaving 2.x behind:
What's so bad about 5.x?  Using it without modern skin support or 
ripping/burning is nearly identical to 2.x.

_________________________________________________________________
Tax headache? MSN Money provides relief with tax tips, tools, IRS forms and 
more! http://moneycentral.msn.com/tax/workshop/welcome.asp

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'icecast-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is
needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.

Christopher G wrote:
>> From: EvilOverlord <eviloverlord@kucs.net>
>> Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org
>> To: icecast@xiph.org
>> Subject: [icecast] Winamp security hole
>> Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 23:14:30 +0100
>>
>> If like me you can't bear the idea of leaving 2.x behind:
> 
> 
> What's so bad about 5.x?  Using it without modern skin support or 
> ripping/burning is nearly identical to 2.x.
> 
What's wrong with 2.x? (apart from this hole)  All that extra stuff is 
just cruft.

Stephen
KUCS.net
--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'icecast-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is
needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.