Stefan Neufeind
2004-Aug-06 14:23 UTC
[icecast] Preventin browsers / wget's / ... from capturing stream?
Hi, I know this has been discussed before - but I don't think that we've come to a "clean" solution. So let me try to ask again: Is there any good way with icecast to prevent browsers / wget's / ... from capturing a stream? I mean, using Shoutcast afaik it's not *that* easily possible to download a stream. But using Icecast you can simply do a wget and grab the audio. This makes mp3-streaming with icecast a "risky" thing in my eyes since clients might always say "well, then I could as well put my music for download on a website". I know there are always ways around it, but avoiding downloading for the average user would at least be good. Has anybody experimented with this? The most clean solution in my eyes would be to implement mms:// or rtp:// for mp3/ogg-streams in Icecast2 ... however, I guess just nobody yet started working on it - or is it really that hard to implement? Anyway - I'm also looking for a good solution (similar to the one of Shoutcast, maybe) for plain http-streaming. Is it possible somehow? <p>Regards, Stefan --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Michael Smith
2004-Aug-06 14:23 UTC
[icecast] Preventin browsers / wget's / ... from capturing stream?
On Monday 01 March 2004 23:42, Stefan Neufeind wrote:> Hi, > > I know this has been discussed before - but I don't think that we've > come to a "clean" solution. So let me try to ask again: > > Is there any good way with icecast to prevent browsers / wget's / ... > from capturing a stream? I mean, using Shoutcast afaik it's not > *that* easily possible to download a stream. But using Icecast you > can simply do a wget and grab the audio. This makes mp3-streaming > with icecast a "risky" thing in my eyes since clients might always > say "well, then I could as well put my music for download on a > website". I know there are always ways around it, but avoiding > downloading for the average user would at least be good. Has anybody > experimented with this?Shoutcast just does user-agent sniffing. This makes it look like you can't download the stream easily, but that's just misleading you - it's completely trivial to do so.> > The most clean solution in my eyes would be to implement mms:// or > rtp:// for mp3/ogg-streams in Icecast2 ... however, I guess just > nobody yet started working on it - or is it really that hard to > implement?It's far from trivial to implement. This would be a very large amount of work.> > Anyway - I'm also looking for a good solution (similar to the one of > Shoutcast, maybe) for plain http-streaming. Is it possible somehow? >Well, you could add nasty user-agent sniffing, but it's pretty pointless. Mike --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Rakotomandimby Mihamina
2004-Aug-06 14:23 UTC
[icecast] Preventin browsers / wget's / ... from capturing stream?
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 02:23, Michael Smith wrote:> Shoutcast just does user-agent sniffing. This makes it look like you can't > download the stream easily, but that's just misleading you - it's > completely trivial to do so.Yes , i'd say the same .> > The most clean solution in my eyes would be to implement mms:// or > > rtp:// for mp3/ogg-streams in Icecast2 ... however, I guess just > > nobody yet started working on it - or is it really that hard to > > implement?Though you could implement it , someone will always be able to "rip" your stream . I have a friend that runs Windows and he found a software that just record what is played by the soundcard, so that he just needs to turn off all the system sounds and can quietly record the stream, whatever is the protocol ...> It's far from trivial to implement. This would be a very large amount of > work.Useless , no worth amount of work ... :-)> > Anyway - I'm also looking for a good solution (similar to the one of > > Shoutcast, maybe) for plain http-streaming. Is it possible somehow? > Well, you could add nasty user-agent sniffing, but it's pretty pointless.treamripper can identify itself as any user-agent you want ... -- Rakotomandimby Mihamina Andrianifaharana Tel : +33 2 38 76 43 65 http://stko.dyndns.info/site_principal/Members/mihamina --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Preventin browsers / wget's / ... from capturing stream?
- Preventin browsers / wget's / ... from capturing stream?
- Preventin browsers / wget's / ... from capturing stream?
- Anybody tried implementing different streaming protocols yet?
- Anybody tried implementing different streaming protocols yet?