Melanie
2004-Aug-06 14:57 UTC
[icecast-dev] Icecast source number problem, ices frozen after reconnect attemps failure (icecastkh13 iceskh48)
Hi, On 2003.11.26 15:42 Karl Heyes wrote:> The reconnectattempts value is from the CVS code, and can be a bit awkward > in general. > > ices can have multiple instances and in these mods can have multiple shout > connections per instance. I don't think terminating ices for just one > shout > connection is acceptable, I'm more inclined to drop the reconnectattempts > completely and treating it as indefinite. Use a value of -1 now for the > same > effect.That would be a showstopper for me. I _need_ ices to terminate if it cannot connect successfully. This ought to be an option, IMHO. Melanie --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Karl Heyes
2004-Aug-06 14:57 UTC
[icecast-dev] Icecast source number problem, ices frozen after reconnect attemps failure (icecastkh13 iceskh48)
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 17:33, Melanie wrote:> Hi, > > On 2003.11.26 15:42 Karl Heyes wrote: > > The reconnectattempts value is from the CVS code, and can be a bit awkward > > in general. > > > > ices can have multiple instances and in these mods can have multiple shout > > connections per instance. I don't think terminating ices for just one > > shout > > connection is acceptable, I'm more inclined to drop the reconnectattempts > > completely and treating it as indefinite. Use a value of -1 now for the > > same > > effect. > > That would be a showstopper for me. I _need_ ices to terminate if it cannot > connect successfully. This ought to be an option, IMHO.That would sound like a poor solution, a connection to one of the servers could die for various reasons, killing all connections would seem an extreme action. If you're thinking of notification then that could be achieved without shutting down ices. What sort of thing would you _need_ to do after ices shut down? <p>karl. <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Melanie
2004-Aug-06 14:57 UTC
[icecast-dev] Icecast source number problem, ices frozen after reconnect attemps failure (icecastkh13 iceskh48)
Hi, On 2003.11.26 20:44 Karl Heyes wrote:> > That would be a showstopper for me. I _need_ ices to terminate if it > cannot > > connect successfully. This ought to be an option, IMHO. > > That would sound like a poor solution, a connection to one of the > servers could die for various reasons, killing all connections would > seem an extreme action. > > If you're thinking of notification then that could be achieved without > shutting down ices. What sort of thing would you _need_ to do after ices > shut down?In that particular case, ices is driven by a GUI. It only uses one instance. I just think that the option to terminate on disconnect is valuable. Many common cases will only have one instance feeding one mount. In that scenario, it makes sense to terminate ices. Terminating raises SIGCHLD, which the app reacts on, giving visual feedback and optionally attempting to restart. Melanie --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Geoff Shang
2004-Aug-06 14:57 UTC
[icecast-dev] Icecast source number problem, ices frozen after reconnect attemps failure (icecastkh13 iceskh48)
On 26 Nov 2003, Karl Heyes wrote:> That would sound like a poor solution, a connection to one of the > servers could die for various reasons, killing all connections would > seem an extreme action.Couldn't you just kill that stream instance, and then kill ices if no stream instances are left alive? Disclaimer: I am not a developer. Geoff. <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Icecast source number problem, ices frozen after reconnect attemps failure (icecastkh13 iceskh48)
- Icecast source number problem, ices frozen after reconnect attemps failure (icecastkh13 iceskh48)
- Icecast source number problem, ices frozen after reconnect attemps failure (icecastkh13 iceskh48)
- Patch to add reconnect(attempts|delay) and maxqueuelenth to IceS doc
- Problem with ices 2.0.1 : open localhost:8000 instead of what is in config file