Shreyansh Shah
2020-Sep-22 09:29 UTC
[Gluster-users] Description of performance.cache-size
Hi, We are using distributed gluster version 5.10 (7 nodes with 2 bricks per node, i.e 14 bricks total). We have set the performance.cache-size parameter as 8GB on server. We assumed that this config parameter indicates the amount of RAM that will be used on the client machine (i.e. upto 8 GB of RAM to be used for data caching at clients). But we observed that on a machine the RAM usage of glusterfs process was around 17GB. So we want to know whether our understanding of the parameter is correct? Or something else that we have missed. Below are the options configured at glusterfs server, please advise if we can add/tune some parameters to extract more performance. storage.health-check-interval: 10 performance.client-io-threads: on performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 60 performance.cache-size: 8GB transport.address-family: inet nfs.disable: on server.keepalive-time: 60 client.keepalive-time: 60 network.ping-timeout: 90 -- Regards, Shreyansh Shah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20200922/52ffd1ab/attachment.html>
Shreyansh Shah
2020-Sep-29 15:29 UTC
[Gluster-users] Description of performance.cache-size
Hi All, Can anyone help me out with this? On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 2:59 PM Shreyansh Shah < shreyansh.shah at alpha-grep.com> wrote:> Hi, > We are using distributed gluster version 5.10 (7 nodes with 2 bricks per > node, i.e 14 bricks total). > > We have set the performance.cache-size parameter as 8GB on server. We > assumed that this config parameter indicates the amount of RAM that will be > used on the client machine (i.e. upto 8 GB of RAM to be used for data > caching at clients). But we observed that on a machine the RAM usage of > glusterfs process was around 17GB. > > So we want to know whether our understanding of the parameter is correct? > Or something else that we have missed. > > Below are the options configured at glusterfs server, please advise if we > can add/tune some parameters to extract more performance. > storage.health-check-interval: 10 > performance.client-io-threads: on > performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 60 > performance.cache-size: 8GB > transport.address-family: inet > nfs.disable: on > server.keepalive-time: 60 > client.keepalive-time: 60 > network.ping-timeout: 90 > > -- > Regards, > Shreyansh Shah >-- Regards, Shreyansh Shah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20200929/c879e892/attachment.html>