Gluster users - Sep 2020 - performance

Il 2020-09-04 01:00 Computerisms Corporation ha scritto:
> For the sake of completeness I am reporting back that your suspicions
> seem to have been validated.  I talked to the data center, they made
> some changes.  we talked again some days later, and they made some
> more changes, and for several days now load average on both machines
> is staying consistently below 5 on both servers.  I still have some
> issues to deal with, but the performance of the machines are now no
> longer a problem.
Great! Any chances to know *what* they did change?
Thanks.

-- 
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

Hi Danti,

the notes are not very verbose, but looks like the following lines were 
removed from their virtualization config:

   <relaxed state='on'/>
   <vapic state='on'/>
   <spinlocks state='on' retries='8191'/>

They also enabled hyperthreading, so having 12 "cores" instead of 6
now.
  Guessing that had a lot to do with it...

On 2020-09-04 8:20 a.m., Gionatan Danti wrote:
> Il 2020-09-04 01:00 Computerisms Corporation ha scritto:
>> For the sake of completeness I am reporting back that your suspicions
>> seem to have been validated.? I talked to the data center, they made
>> some changes.? we talked again some days later, and they made some
>> more changes, and for several days now load average on both machines
>> is staying consistently below 5 on both servers.? I still have some
>> issues to deal with, but the performance of the machines are now no
>> longer a problem.
> 
> Great! Any chances to know *what* they did change?
> Thanks.
>