Disperse volumes are not best suited for small read/writes.
Probably if you can tell us more about your use case, we can come up with some
options which could help you.
- Are you using fuse mount or nfs mount?
- Are these small writes sequential or random?
---
Ashish
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcus Peders?n" <marcus.pedersen at slu.se>
To: gluster-users at gluster.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 1:23:15 PM
Subject: [Gluster-users] Dispersed cluster tune, optimize
Hi all,
I have setup a dispersed cluster (2+1), verision 3.12.
I guessed that we going to get punished by small read/writes...
and I was right.
A calculation that usually takes 48 hours
took about 60 hours and there are many small read/writes
to intermediate files that at the end get summed up.
Is there a way to tune, optimize a dispersed cluster to work
better with small read/writes?
Many thanks in advance!
Best resgards
Marcus Peders?n
--
**************************************************
* Marcus Peders?n *
* System administrator *
**************************************************
* Interbull Centre *
* ================ *
* Department of Animal Breeding & Genetics ? SLU *
* Box 7023, SE-750 07 *
* Uppsala, Sweden *
**************************************************
* Visiting address: *
* Room 55614, Ulls v?g 26, Ultuna *
* Uppsala *
* Sweden *
* *
* Tel: +46-(0)18-67 1962 *
* *
**************************************************
* ISO 9001 Bureau Veritas No SE004561-1 *
**************************************************
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users at gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180403/bdafa7bd/attachment.html>