Hi all I've googled but can't find an answer to my question. I have two data centers. Currently, I have a replica (count of 2 plus arbiter) in one data center but is used by both. I want to change this to be a distributed replica across the two data centers. There is a 20Mbps pipe and approx 22 ms latency. Is this sufficient? I really don't want to do the geo-replication in its current form. Thanks CC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170925/cf7f1dee/attachment.html>
Hi Collin, During our arbiter latency testing for completion of ops we found the below results:- an arbiter node in another data centre and both the data bricks in the same data centre, 1) File-size 1 KB (10000 files ) 2) mkdir Latency 5ms 10ms 20ms 50ms 100ms 200ms Ops Create 755 secs 1410 secs 2717 secs 5874 secs 12908 sec 26113 sec Mkdir 922 secs 1725 secs 3325 secs 8127 secs 16160 sec 30079 sec Thanks & Regards On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Colin Coe <colin.coe at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi all > > I've googled but can't find an answer to my question. > > I have two data centers. Currently, I have a replica (count of 2 plus > arbiter) in one data center but is used by both. > > I want to change this to be a distributed replica across the two data > centers. > > There is a 20Mbps pipe and approx 22 ms latency. Is this sufficient? > > I really don't want to do the geo-replication in its current form. > > Thanks > > CC > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >-- KARAN SANDHA ASSOCIATE QUALITY ENGINEER Red Hat Bangalore <https://www.redhat.com/> ksandha at redhat.com M: 9888009555 IM: Karan on @irc <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> @redhatnews <https://twitter.com/redhatnews> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170927/27b67a82/attachment.html>
Interesting table Karan!, Could you please tell us how you did the benchmark? fio or iozone orsimilar? thanks Arman. On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Karan Sandha <ksandha at redhat.com> wrote:> Hi Collin, > > During our arbiter latency testing for completion of ops we found the > below results:- an arbiter node in another data centre and both the data > bricks in the same data centre, > > 1) File-size 1 KB (10000 files ) > 2) mkdir > > > Latency > > 5ms > > 10ms > > 20ms > > 50ms > > 100ms > > 200ms > > Ops > > Create > > 755 secs > > 1410 secs > > 2717 secs > > 5874 secs > > 12908 sec > > 26113 sec > > Mkdir > > 922 secs > > 1725 secs > > 3325 secs > > 8127 secs > > 16160 sec > > 30079 sec > > > Thanks & Regards > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Colin Coe <colin.coe at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I've googled but can't find an answer to my question. >> >> I have two data centers. Currently, I have a replica (count of 2 plus >> arbiter) in one data center but is used by both. >> >> I want to change this to be a distributed replica across the two data >> centers. >> >> There is a 20Mbps pipe and approx 22 ms latency. Is this sufficient? >> >> I really don't want to do the geo-replication in its current form. >> >> Thanks >> >> CC >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users at gluster.org >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > > > > -- > > KARAN SANDHA > > ASSOCIATE QUALITY ENGINEER > > Red Hat Bangalore <https://www.redhat.com/> > > ksandha at redhat.com M: 9888009555 IM: Karan on @irc > <https://red.ht/sig> > TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> > @redhatnews <https://twitter.com/redhatnews> Red Hat > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat > <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170928/92624e2c/attachment.html>